2025–2026: from findings to follow-through

Promises continued Spanish broadcast appearances and farmworker/community presentations while explicitly refusing expanded social media; detailed refusal continues on page 3.

Not yet implemented; says implementation begins July 1, 2026, including at least one English/Spanish social post explaining that immigration enforcement is not a local police function.

Provides no response because R1 is not directed to the Board of Supervisors.

Claims implemented through a live real-time dashboard rather than additional periodic reports. Page 7 directs future annual TRUTH Act reporting at an evening meeting and identifies the public dashboard URL.

Declines R3 as written. Pages 7–9 explain privacy concerns about disaggregated individual data and adopt a modified Sonoma matrix retaining a third category for qualifying charged felonies.

Claims implemented: cease notifications based on misdemeanor-wobbler convictions and reduce felony-wobbler lookback from 15 to 10 years. Page 10 retains notifications for qualifying charged felony offenses.

Will implement by December 31, 2027, one year later than requested; EPL implementation is targeted for December 31, 2026, followed by assessment of remaining gaps.

Claims implemented through an IT Systems Support Analyst acting as lead for implementation, testing and release with CRD and other departments.

Requires further analysis of whether EPL needs additional tracking systems or improvements, to be completed by December 31, 2027.

Will implement by December 31, 2026, building formal review timelines into EPL.

Requires further analysis after EPL implementation, evaluating streamlining mechanisms and shared responsibilities by December 31, 2027.

Will implement by December 31, 2026 through formal review timelines in EPL.

Will implement the HR-led citywide growth/development program by December 31, 2026. Claims a new Manager hire, a July 20 Associate Planner start scheduled and expected full staffing by year end.

Will implement by December 31, 2026 through the HR-led citywide growth/development and succession program.

Will implement by December 31, 2026; says Division policies and procedures should be documented for consistent practice.

Will implement by December 31, 2026; beneficial areas have been identified and opportunities will be identified as staff are onboarded.

Will implement by December 31, 2026 by scheduling a regular Council discussion and direction to assist drafting extension policies.

Will implement by December 31, 2026 by scheduling Council discussion and direction at a regular meeting.

Will implement by December 31, 2026 by scheduling Council discussion and direction at a regular meeting.

Requires further analysis; anticipates presenting scope, budget, procurement approach and implementation schedule no later than December 22, 2026. Says completed assessment by September 30 is not feasible.

Requires further analysis. Page 17 anticipates proposed scope, schedule and funding strategy by December 22, 2026; final plan depends on assessment, procurement, funding and Council direction.

Not yet implemented but will implement. Page 18 anticipates enhanced reporting for the January 2027 advisory-committee meeting, including characteristics, geography, frequency/severity and resolution as practicable.

Requires further analysis. Pages 18–19 promise analysis and next steps by December 22, 2026, with any further rate study conditional. Says resulting revisions would not finish before approximately July 1, 2027; OSAA surcharges will be renegotiated as contracts renew.

Requires further analysis. Pages 19–20 anticipate policy consideration/adoption by December 31, 2026, evaluating employment requirements for senior managers but encouragement and individual choice for elected Council members.

Partially agrees that fear persists and Spanish outreach can expand, but rejects expanding social media. Describes in-person presentations, Spanish cable programming and at least 20 presentations to Spanish-speaking groups; page 3 explains polarization and limited Spanish-only social audiences.

Partially agrees that immigration fears persist and more Spanish outreach is possible. Describes bilingual personal contact and, on page 2, social media’s reach alongside divisive comments and lost messages.

Agrees and describes the 2024 Language Access Committee, Spanish translation of County social posts and December 2024 Inclusivity Committee coordination with community partners.

Agrees and says reporting is being adjusted through a publicly accessible real-time TRUTH Act dashboard, with details in R2/R3.

The Board agrees with Finding 3.

Partially disagrees: accepts the manual project spreadsheet and possible efficiency gains but questions its asserted connection to billing practices.

Partially disagrees: accepts unreimbursed time and General Fund subsidy, says recovery varies and identifies counter inquiries and zoning-ordinance work as reasonable nonbillable activity.

Disagrees that structured coordination is absent, while accepting that the entitlement review process can improve.

Disagrees: says tracking methods and interdepartmental review timelines exist, though relatively manual and improvable.

Agrees and cites Director/Planning Manager turnover and Senior Planner retirements within the past 24 months.

Partially disagrees only that all projects can receive three extensions totaling six years; agrees progress has not consistently been a measure for extensions.

The City agrees with this finding.

Partially disagrees: accepts recurring taste/odor/color concerns and further work, but disputes earmarking and single-cause framing. Pages 3–5 cite treatment changes, Proposition 218 and representative-customer bill reconstruction; methodology appears on pages 21–22.

Partially disagrees: accepts further comprehensive assessment and rehabilitation planning but disputes absence of projects/planning. Pages 5–7 name budgeted pipeline projects and June 8–12, 2026 flushing work.

Partially disagrees: concedes historical inconsistency but disputes absence of sufficient decision information. Pages 7–9 cite the August 28, 2019 jury response, Grapevine, public reports, monitoring and engineering information.

Partially disagrees: accepts aging assets and investment needs but rejects ineffective-use inference. Pages 9–11 cite spending/project counts, retained balances, drought/operator costs and June 21, 2025 outside-counsel memorandum.

Partially disagrees: accepts 2016 changes but rejects a single undifferentiated rate and inherent inequity. Pages 11–12 describe 2023 Raftelis/advisory-committee tiered consumption rates and Proposition 218 cost-of-service constraints.

Partially disagrees: accepts OSAA customers are outside Measure H taxation but disputes implication they contribute nothing to system costs. Pages 12–13 distinguish voter-approved bonds from contractual rates and acknowledge equity concerns.

Partially disagrees: acknowledges recurring problems and periods of insufficient project oversight but rejects uniform institutional-failure framing. Pages 13–15 cite capital/operational changes and regional staffing constraints.