Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F1

Finding F1

The Planning Division’s cost-recovery model is constrained by inconsistent project billing practices. The department relies on a manually updated spreadsheet to track active projects and historical information, increasing the risk of error and limiting transparency. Significant staff time is required for time-tracking and chargebacks, reducing operational efficiency.

Jury report: Strengthening Napa’s Planning Division: Technology, Coordination, and Workforce Stability · PDF page 10

Permanent link

Official response

City of Napa City Council

Partially disagrees: accepts the manual project spreadsheet and possible efficiency gains but questions its asserted connection to billing practices.

Read official response · PDF page 1

Explicit accepted/disputed scope and specific explanation distinguish project tracking from billing. No supporting billing record is identified.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions