Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Plumas County Civil Grand Jury

2025-2026: from findings to follow-through

Overview

Explore the jury’s recommendations, read matching agency responses, and join the discussion. Everything in this cycle is connected to its original source.

Recommendations & responses

Every recommendation made by the jury, with matching agency responses alongside it.

Recommendations & responses

Showing 7 of 7 recommendations

Jump to recommendation

The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview

3 recommendations

Recommendation R1

The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of Public Works to develop and implement a formal, standardized method for the submission and tracking of citizen complaints regarding roadway issues. Suggested completion date January 1, 2027.

No response recorded

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Recommendation R2

The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of Public Works/County Engineer to conduct a documented cost-benefit analysis of the County’s ¾-inch Type B aggregate asphalt specification compared with alternative mix options, including mixes compatible with those produced at the local plant. (1) The analysis should include evaluation of whether aligning mix specifications, in whole or in part, with the dominant plant production mix would reduce delays and lifecycle costs without materially compromising pavement durability under local traffic and climate conditions. (2) The analysis should consider production changeover costs, crew delays, overtime, seasonal constraints, and pavement performance history. Suggested completion date May 1, 2027.

No response recorded

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Recommendation R3

The Board of Supervisors direct the Plumas County Department of Public Works/Roads to conduct a comprehensive review and reorganization of its website to improve public access and transparency by (1) consolidating road-related information into a clearly structured and centralized location, (2) implementing standardized posting practices that include consistent dates, status updates, and project completion information, and (3) establishing a regular review process to ensure that outdated or incomplete materials are updated or archived. Suggested completion date July 1, 2027.

No response recorded

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 31

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County

4 recommendations

Recommendation R1

The Board of Supervisors form an ad hoc committee, including stakeholders from the equine community, finance, and facility services, to determine the best approach for improving the Fairgrounds’ equine area and to plan funding for improvements. Suggested completion date January 1, 2027.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implement

Agrees to work with the new Fair Director to establish an ad hoc committee that meets at least once to determine an improvement approach and plan funding.

Read official response · PDF page 2

Recommendation R2

The Board of Supervisors create a shared Fiscal Coordinator position to serve part time at the Fairgrounds and other departments as needed. Suggested completion date July 1, 2027.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 13

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors
Agency says further analysis needed

Agrees, says the newly hired CAO effectively serves as a fiscal coordinator, and will review the feasibility of a dedicated or shared fiscal officer with the Fair Director.

Read official response · PDF page 2

Recommendation R3

The Board of Supervisors support the Buildings/Grounds Maintenance Supervisor either by establishing a partnership between the Fairgrounds and County Facility Services or by hiring additional, year-round maintenance workers to assist with Fairgrounds maintenance and projects. Suggested completion date July 1, 2027.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 13

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors
Agency says further analysis needed

Agrees to determine maintenance needs with the new Fair Director and assess whether additional hires or shared departmental workers would meet them.

Read official response · PDF page 3

Recommendation R4

The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of Fair and Fairground Events to standardize office and fiscal procedures in accordance with County practices. 1. Implement a formal complaint system to log complaints and their resolution 2. Implement a maintenance project log to track man hours and actual costs of projects and capital improvements 3. Implement a preventive maintenance system to document completion of seasonal maintenance and assist in scheduling of preventive maintenance items. Suggested implementation date: prior to the 2027 Plumas Sierra County Fair.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View recommendation and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 13

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implement

Agrees and will direct the new Fair Manager to implement complaint and resolution logging, maintenance-project hours/cost records, and seasonal preventive-maintenance documentation.

Read official response · PDF page 3

Findings

The jury’s formal findings, with source citations and any recorded responses.

Findings & responses

Showing 21 of 21 findings

Jump to finding

Review of County Election Procedures

6 findings

Finding F1

The Grand Jury observed security procedures implemented at multiple stages of the ballot handling and tabulation process, including restricted access to election equipment storage areas and camera monitoring of adjacent hallways where election operations occur.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Review of County Election Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F2

The ballot counting room operates without internet or wireless connectivity, and election procedures prohibit personal phones or other communication devices from being brought into the room.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Review of County Election Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F3

Daily vote tallies are transmitted to the State through a password-protected reporting system requiring multiple authentication steps.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Review of County Election Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F4

Ballots are stored in accordance with state law, and the Elections Department maintains documentation verifying compliance with state election requirements.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Review of County Election Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F5

Elections staff regularly update voter registration records. When ballots are returned as undeliverable, staff attempt to locate the affected voters and encourage them to update their registration information.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Review of County Election Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F6

The ballot verification process is open to public observation during ballot tabulation.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Review of County Election Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview

6 findings

Finding F1

Based on interviews conducted, communication among the Director, Deputy Director, Public Works staff and District Supervisors is effective and contributes to the smooth operation of the department.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F2

Employee morale is high, resulting in more efficiency by employees and greater public satisfaction.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F3

Limited availability of asphalt delays projects, reduces seasonal productivity, and creates operational inefficiencies, including potential crew downtime, increased overtime, and challenges in scheduling work dependent on external asphalt plant production.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F4

The DPWR website is difficult to navigate, with road-related information dispersed across multiple locations, inconsistently dated documents, and incomplete project updates, limiting the public’s ability to easily access clear and current information.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F5

The Department of Public Works lacks a formal, standardized procedure for the submission and tracking of citizen complaints regarding roadway issues, which limits consistency, transparency, and the ability to maintain a historical record of previously reported concerns.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F6

The lack of competitive salaries contributes to challenges in hiring and retaining employees, resulting in a loss of efficiency in the DPWR’s mission.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · PDF page 30

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County

8 findings

Finding F1

The Fairgrounds’ equine facilities - including the horse barns, arena fencing, bucking chutes and staging areas - are in poor condition, making them unsuitable for effective use by large animals.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View finding and responses

Finding F2

The lack of a dedicated, maintenance budget line item for the equine area limits repairs and improvements, limiting the number of equine events that could increase revenue for the Fairgrounds and benefit the county’s economy.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors

Disagrees: a maintenance budget already exists and a separate line item does not necessarily determine priority. Supervisors will join the ad hoc committee to give the equine area attention.

Read official response · PDF page 1

Finding F3

Many areas of the Fairgrounds require repair, maintenance and capital improvements, putting safety at risk, limiting community use, and hindering effective operations.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors

Agrees that repair and capital work are required and may limit community use and effective operations.

Read official response · PDF page 2

Finding F4

The Building/Grounds Maintenance Supervisor is the only maintenance staff for most of the year, limiting the maintenance projects that can be accomplished.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors

Agrees and will work with the new Fair Director to seek funding to increase maintenance work.

Read official response · PDF page 2

Finding F5

Extra help is hired during the summer and other seasons, but this labor is generally unskilled, limiting the scope of maintenance projects requiring more expertise.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors

Agrees that limited technical training can restrict project scope, while citing skilled licensed contractors for current electrical repairs and the Art Barn wall rebuild.

Read official response · PDF page 2

Finding F6

The loss of the Fiscal Coordinator position requires the Director of Fair and Fairground Events to perform all associated duties, increasing the risk of accounting irregularities during large events.

1 response · Plumas County Board of Supervisors

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official response
Plumas County Board of Supervisors

Agrees and will seek better fiscal oversight through system improvements or shared fiscal duties with another department.

Read official response · PDF page 2

Finding F7

There is no formal system for monitoring complaints or ensuring compliance for people or groups using the Fairgrounds, resulting in limited transparency, inconsistent follow-up, and reduced accountability.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Finding F8

There is no formal system for tracking preventive or corrective maintenance – including projects, labor hours and associated costs – limiting the Fairgrounds’ ability to reliably plan, budget, or prioritize repairs, and increasing the risk of equipment failure and unsafe conditions.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · PDF page 12

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Follow-up Review of Grand Jury Recommendations

1 finding

Finding Findings

A review of follow-up responses indicates that Plumas County officials are generally willing to implement the Grand Jury’s recommendations, although the pace of implementation may vary depending on the complexity of the recommendation. Some responses suggest that the Grand Jury’s recommendations were too broad or unclear.

No response recorded

View finding and responses

Jury report: Follow-up Review of Grand Jury Recommendations · PDF page 55

Permanent link
Official responses
No response recorded
A matching agency response has not been added to Grand Jury Hub. This does not establish whether a response was submitted or is overdue.

Questions

Editorial discussion prompts inspired by the reports. These are separate from the jury’s formal findings and recommendations.

Civic question

What information would make a road-issue reporting and tracking system useful?

F5 identifies no standardized complaint process; R1 recommends one, with a January 1, 2027 suggested completion date.
Why this matters
A traceable process can help residents and staff understand recurring roadway concerns.

Supporting report

The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · Findings F5 and Recommendations R1

Civic question

How should the county explain asphalt tradeoffs and keep road-project updates current?

R2 requests a documented asphalt cost-benefit analysis; R3 requests centralized, dated and regularly reviewed website information.
Why this matters
Clear project information lets residents distinguish material constraints from maintenance priorities.

Supporting report

The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview · Recommendations R2–R3

Civic question

Which information should an equine-area stakeholder committee share when setting priorities?

R1 recommends a committee including equine, finance and facility-services stakeholders to plan improvements and funding. The Board promises a committee meeting but does not specify all requested membership or timing.
Why this matters
Visible tradeoffs can help residents understand improvement and funding choices.

Supporting report

The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · Recommendations R1

Civic question

What should complaint and maintenance records show about Fairgrounds work?

R4 calls for complaint logs, project hours and costs, and preventive-maintenance records. The Board commits to these systems without a stated implementation date.
Why this matters
Records can clarify outstanding repairs, resource use and follow-through.

Supporting report

The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County · Recommendations R4

Civic question

What information would help residents observe ballot verification?

F6 states that ballot verification is open to public observation during tabulation. The jury makes no recommendations.
Why this matters
Knowing how observation works can make existing election procedures more understandable.

Supporting report

Review of County Election Procedures · Findings F6

Civic question

Which observed ballot-handling safeguards would residents like explained?

F1–F5 describe restricted equipment access, isolated counting, authenticated reporting, lawful storage and registration updates.
Why this matters
Concrete explanations support informed questions without implying a recommendation the jury did not make.

Supporting report

Review of County Election Procedures · Findings F1–F5

Civic question

What support could help small-county juries recruit members and preserve continuity?

The informational survey discusses recruitment, resignations, administrative resources and legal support. It contains no formal findings or recommendations.
Why this matters
Continuity and accessible support can help volunteer juries sustain their work.

Supporting report

Statewide Survey of Small County Civil Grand Juries: Informational Report · Summary of Results — Jury Composition and Operations

Civic question

What would make recommendations and progress updates clearer to residents?

The current unnumbered finding notes generally willing officials, varying implementation pace and responses suggesting some recommendations were broad or unclear.
Why this matters
Specific requests and transparent updates make longer-term follow-up easier to interpret.

Supporting report

Follow-up Review of Grand Jury Recommendations · Findings (unnumbered)

Sources

Original reports and response documents provide the evidence behind this cycle’s findings, recommendations, and discussions.

Report overview: Statewide Survey of Small County Civil Grand Juries: Informational Report

Official report

Statewide Survey of Small County Civil Grand Juries: Informational Report

Describes a survey sent to thirteen small-county juries, with ten responses, examining recruitment, resignations, administrative resources and legal support. This informational section makes no formal findings or recommendations. Chapter in the unchanged final compilation, physical PDF pages 7–14.
Report overviewOfficial PDF
Report overview: Review of County Election Procedures

Official report

Review of County Election Procedures

Records observed ballot handling, restricted equipment access, isolated counting operations, registration maintenance and public observation. Contains six findings and no recommendations or required responses. Chapter in the unchanged final compilation, physical PDF pages 15–16.
Report overviewOfficial PDF
Report overview: The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview

Official report

The 680-Mile Marathon: High-Altitude Maintenance on a Low-Altitude Budget — Plumas County Roads: A Department Overview

Examines road staffing, asphalt availability, funding, website information and complaint handling. Recommends a standardized complaint process, an asphalt cost-benefit study and a clearer website. Chapter in the unchanged final compilation, physical PDF pages 17–33.
Report overviewOfficial PDF
Report overview: The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County

Response available

The Fairgrounds: Polishing a Jewel of Our County

Examines equine facilities, maintenance capacity, fiscal staffing and operational records. Recommends a stakeholder committee, shared fiscal support, maintenance staffing and standardized complaint and maintenance systems. Citations use the unchanged 19-page April 3 interim original. Its findings and recommendations repeat in the final compilation with only subpart-formatting differences; counted once.
Report overviewCounty response & auditOfficial PDF
Report overview: Detention Facility Inquiry Statement

Official report

Detention Facility Inquiry Statement

Describes the October 1, 2025 tour of the county correctional facility and states that no observations warranted further investigation. An inquiry statement, not a full detention investigation or a new formal findings/recommendations section. Chapter in the unchanged final compilation, physical PDF page 51.
Report overviewOfficial PDF
Report overview: Follow-up Review of Grand Jury Recommendations

Official report

Follow-up Review of Grand Jury Recommendations

Reviews implementation updates concerning 2022–2024 recommendations. Contains one current unnumbered finding and quoted prior-year recommendations and responses, which are not new current-cycle items or separately scored responses. The summary and detailed results give different implementation percentages; this description does not resolve that source inconsistency. Chapter in the unchanged final compilation, physical PDF pages 52–60.
Report overviewOfficial PDF

Response documents

Board of Supervisors response to the interim Fairgrounds report · Plumas County Board of Supervisors · 2026-06-16 · PDF