Response says
Partly agrees that flexibility helps and defends office days’ operational purpose.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOARD-F4
Deputies are subject to a restrictive work schedule which requires them to be present in the office every Tuesday and Thursday, and this interferes with their ability to complete in-person visits once every ninety days.
What should residents consider about Finding BOARD-F4: Deputies are subject to a restrictive work schedule which requires them to be present in the office every Tuesday and Thursday, and this interferes with their ability to complete in-person visits once every ninety days., and the County’s response?
See per-item agency attributionAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Pages 7–8 describe record work, meetings and support access. Disputing an inferred lack of purpose does not clearly isolate the finding’s actual interference claim about the two-day requirement.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Pages 7–8 describe record work, meetings and support access. Disputing an inferred lack of purpose does not clearly isolate the finding’s actual interference claim about the two-day requirement.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...