Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOARD-F3

A master schedule must be developed and implemented to ensure that a vehicle filled with an appropriate number of deputies travels once every ninety days to each facility where multiple conservatees are housed.

What should residents consider about Finding BOARD-F3: A master schedule must be developed and implemented to ensure that a vehicle filled with an appropriate number of deputies travels once every ninety days to each facility where multiple conservatees are housed., and the County’s response?

See per-item agency attributionAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Partly agrees on coordination but questions a master calendar as the primary control.

Audit analysis

Pages 6–7 discuss individual case responsibility and a supplementary calendar. The disputed primary-control premise is not explicit in the finding; the reply does not clearly isolate its position on the full required facility/vehicle schedule.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Pages 6–7 discuss individual case responsibility and a supplementary calendar. The disputed primary-control premise is not explicit in the finding; the reply does not clearly isolate its position on the full required facility/vehicle schedule.

Scoring confidence: high