Response says
Partly agrees on coordination but questions a master calendar as the primary control.
What should residents consider about Finding BOARD-F3: A master schedule must be developed and implemented to ensure that a vehicle filled with an appropriate number of deputies travels once every ninety days to each facility where multiple conservatees are housed., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partly agrees on coordination but questions a master calendar as the primary control.
Audit analysis
Pages 6–7 discuss individual case responsibility and a supplementary calendar. The disputed primary-control premise is not explicit in the finding; the reply does not clearly isolate its position on the full required facility/vehicle schedule.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Pages 6–7 discuss individual case responsibility and a supplementary calendar. The disputed primary-control premise is not explicit in the finding; the reply does not clearly isolate its position on the full required facility/vehicle schedule.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.