Response says
Partly agrees; says a new Panoramic last-visit report already functions.
What should residents consider about Finding BOARD-F2: The Panoramic software used by the Public Guardian is customizable and must be updated to specifically track and report in-person visits with conservatees by deputies so that Public Guardian Management can ensure that individual deputies are able to complete in-person visits as required., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partly agrees; says a new Panoramic last-visit report already functions.
Audit analysis
Pages 5–6 distinguish customizable capabilities and current configuration from prior use gaps. This is a clear temporal/capability distinction, not independent testing of visit data.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Pages 5–6 distinguish customizable capabilities and current configuration from prior use gaps. This is a clear temporal/capability distinction, not independent testing of visit data.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.