Jury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkMono County Civil Grand Jury
2024-2025: from findings to follow-through
Overview
Explore the jury’s recommendations, read matching agency responses, and join the discussion. Everything in this cycle is connected to its original source.
Recommendations & responses
Every recommendation made by the jury, with matching agency responses alongside it.
Recommendations & responses
Showing 23 of 23 recommendations
Jump to recommendation
Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness
8 recommendations
Recommendation R1
The Grand Jury commends the Information Technology department for their ongoing efforts on cybersecurity preparedness.
No response recorded
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R1
The Grand Jury commends the Information Technology department for their ongoing efforts on cybersecurity preparedness.
No response recorded
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsRecommendation R2
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of Finance and Director of IT to document and put into practice a cooperative process for completing the annual PCI Compliance assessment. Recommendation to be completed by 08/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R2
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of Finance and Director of IT to document and put into practice a cooperative process for completing the annual PCI Compliance assessment. Recommendation to be completed by 08/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementPlans staff training and collaboration among IT, Finance, and payment-processing departments. Will seek Board direction on the completion timeline.
Read official response · PDF page 6Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementPlans staff training and collaboration among IT, Finance, and payment-processing departments. Expects this work in fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 14Recommendation R3
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of Finance and Director of IT to determine the correct PCI SAQ form(s) to be used in the County’s next annual PCI Compliance assessment and attestation. Recommendation to be completed by 08/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R3
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of Finance and Director of IT to determine the correct PCI SAQ form(s) to be used in the County’s next annual PCI Compliance assessment and attestation. Recommendation to be completed by 08/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementPlans to identify the correct SAQ with Finance and other payment-processing departments before the close of fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 7Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementPlans to identify the correct SAQ with Finance and other payment-processing departments before the close of fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 15Recommendation R4
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to document a plan to implement immutable backups for operationally critical data. Plan to be documented by 9/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R4
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to document a plan to implement immutable backups for operationally critical data. Plan to be documented by 9/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementAgrees and proposes research, departmental consultation, implementation procedures, and fiscal year 2025–2026 resource requests.
Read official response · PDF page 7Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementAgrees and proposes research, departmental consultation, implementation procedures, and fiscal year 2025–2026 resource requests.
Read official response · PDF page 15Recommendation R5
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to define a sustainable annual process to remove or replace unsupported computing devices from the environment. Recommendation to be completed by 08/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R5
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to define a sustainable annual process to remove or replace unsupported computing devices from the environment. Recommendation to be completed by 08/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementAgrees to update replacement procedures, monitor costs, and seek personnel resources by the close of fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 8Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementAgrees to update replacement procedures, monitor costs, and seek personnel resources by the close of fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 16Recommendation R6
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to define a sustainable process to conduct periodic external penetration tests and vulnerability scans. Recommendation to be completed by 09/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R6
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to define a sustainable process to conduct periodic external penetration tests and vulnerability scans. Recommendation to be completed by 09/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 8
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementAgrees to explore testing vendors and establish a periodic schedule, with implementation tied to fiscal year 2025–2026 resources.
Read official response · PDF page 8Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementAgrees to explore testing vendors and establish a periodic schedule, with implementation tied to fiscal year 2025–2026 resources.
Read official response · PDF page 16Recommendation R7
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to assess the staffing and capacity demands needed to reasonably support Information Technology’s Cyber Security roadmap for the purpose of submitting such staffing in its next fiscal year budget. Recommendation to be completed by 10/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R7
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to assess the staffing and capacity demands needed to reasonably support Information Technology’s Cyber Security roadmap for the purpose of submitting such staffing in its next fiscal year budget. Recommendation to be completed by 10/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 8
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementAgrees to assess staffing and develop a Cyber Security Analyst allocation and job description; personnel requests are to be included in fiscal year 2026–2027 proposals. Says the full assessment can occur after September 11, 2025.
Read official response · PDF page 8Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementAgrees to assess staffing and develop a Cyber Security Analyst allocation and job description; personnel requests are to be included in fiscal year 2026–2027 proposals.
Read official response · PDF page 16Recommendation R8
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to implement a process for providing the Board of Supervisors a quarterly report on employee compliance to cybersecurity training. Recommendation to be completed by 10/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R8
The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to implement a process for providing the Board of Supervisors a quarterly report on employee compliance to cybersecurity training. Recommendation to be completed by 10/01/2025.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 8
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agency plans to implementAgrees to quarterly reports to the Board and department heads, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 9Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementAgrees to quarterly reports to the Board and department heads, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 17Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
8 recommendations
Recommendation R1
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners implement a procedure to provide thorough training for all LAFCO commissioners and the LAFCO Executive Officer. Training should include a study of their granted and restricted authority, proactive role, a thorough review of the Mono LAFCO Handbook, and the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. The recommendation is to be completed by 10/1/25.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R1
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners implement a procedure to provide thorough training for all LAFCO commissioners and the LAFCO Executive Officer. Training should include a study of their granted and restricted authority, proactive role, a thorough review of the Mono LAFCO Handbook, and the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. The recommendation is to be completed by 10/1/25.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency plans to implementAccepts adding Handbook training to annual instruction, favors targeted legal training, and describes ongoing specialized training for the Executive Officer.
Read official response · PDF page 6Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency plans to implementAccepts adding Handbook training to annual instruction, favors targeted legal training, and describes ongoing specialized training for the Executive Officer.
Read official response · PDF page 16Recommendation R2
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define an SOI and Service Review policy for satisfying California State law regarding the update of SOI's and pre-requisite service reviews every 5 years. The approach should outline criteria to guide the depth and rigor of analysis, criteria for ranking priority of update efforts, cadence of updates across all entities they oversee, and an approach for community engagement. The recommendation is to be completed by 10/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R2
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define an SOI and Service Review policy for satisfying California State law regarding the update of SOI's and pre-requisite service reviews every 5 years. The approach should outline criteria to guide the depth and rigor of analysis, criteria for ranking priority of update efforts, cadence of updates across all entities they oversee, and an approach for community engagement. The recommendation is to be completed by 10/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency position unclearSupports reviews using five years as a benchmark and a comprehensive review in 2025; makes a formal policy contingent on Commission direction.
Read official response · PDF page 7Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency position unclearSupports reviews using five years as a benchmark and a comprehensive review in 2025; makes a formal policy contingent on Commission direction.
Read official response · PDF page 16Recommendation R3
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners submit an SOI and Service Review policy to a LAFCO Legal Counsel specialist for review and ratification. The recommendation is to be completed by 11/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R3
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners submit an SOI and Service Review policy to a LAFCO Legal Counsel specialist for review and ratification. The recommendation is to be completed by 11/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency plans to implementAgrees that any developed policy should receive County Counsel review but rejects the need for a specialist.
Read official response · PDF page 7Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency plans to implementAgrees that any developed policy should receive County Counsel review but rejects the need for a specialist.
Read official response · PDF page 17Recommendation R4
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners adopt and publish the ratified SOI and Service Review policy. The recommendation is to be completed by 11/15/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R4
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners adopt and publish the ratified SOI and Service Review policy. The recommendation is to be completed by 11/15/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency plans to implementSays any developed policy will be adopted at a noticed public hearing and published.
Read official response · PDF page 8Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency plans to implementSays any developed policy will be adopted at a noticed public hearing and published.
Read official response · PDF page 17Recommendation R5
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define, adopt, and publish a timeline for SOI and Service Review update activity for calendar year 2026. The recommendation is to be completed by 12/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R5
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define, adopt, and publish a timeline for SOI and Service Review update activity for calendar year 2026. The recommendation is to be completed by 12/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency plans to implementPlans to finish the comprehensive sphere review in 2025 and publish timelines for any service reviews in future meeting materials.
Read official response · PDF page 8Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency plans to implementPlans to finish the comprehensive sphere review in 2025 and publish timelines for any service reviews in future meeting materials.
Read official response · PDF page 18Recommendation R6
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners estimate and propose to funding agencies the required budget for SOI and Service Review update activity for calendar year 2026. The recommendation is to be completed by 12/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R6
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners estimate and propose to funding agencies the required budget for SOI and Service Review update activity for calendar year 2026. The recommendation is to be completed by 12/1/2025.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency plans to implementUses fiscal-year budgeting; says the proposed 2025–2026 budget funds the sphere review and service-review budgets or amendments will follow if needed.
Read official response · PDF page 9Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency plans to implementUses fiscal-year budgeting; says the proposed 2025–2026 budget funds the sphere review and service-review budgets or amendments will follow if needed.
Read official response · PDF page 18Recommendation R7
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define and put into practice a process for tracking and reporting status of SOI and Service Review update progress to the public on a periodic timeline. The recommendation is to be completed by 1/1/2026.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R7
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define and put into practice a process for tracking and reporting status of SOI and Service Review update progress to the public on a periodic timeline. The recommendation is to be completed by 1/1/2026.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency says implementedSays review progress already appears on all meeting agendas published online and rejects a separate tracker or database.
Read official response · PDF page 9Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency says implementedSays review progress already appears on all meeting agendas published online and rejects a separate tracker or database.
Read official response · PDF page 18Recommendation R8
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define best-practice guidelines on measuring adequacy and efficiency of provided services in order to guide special districts on how best to measure their service delivery performance. The recommendation is to be completed by 2/1/26.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R8
The grand jury recommends the Mono LAFCO Commissioners define best-practice guidelines on measuring adequacy and efficiency of provided services in order to guide special districts on how best to measure their service delivery performance. The recommendation is to be completed by 2/1/26.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 8
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Agency declines implementationDisagrees, saying routine oversight of district operations is outside LAFCO’s authority and unsolicited guidance would be discretionary.
Read official response · PDF page 9Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Agency declines implementationDisagrees, saying routine oversight of district operations is outside LAFCO’s authority and unsolicited guidance would be discretionary.
Read official response · PDF page 19Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes
3 recommendations
Recommendation R1
The Grand Jury commends the Mammoth Lakes Police Department for their focus on the care of the Mammoth Lakes residents and visitors as it relates to detainment and arrest processes.
No response recorded
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R1
The Grand Jury commends the Mammoth Lakes Police Department for their focus on the care of the Mammoth Lakes residents and visitors as it relates to detainment and arrest processes.
No response recorded
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 5
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Recommendation R2
The grand jury recommends that the board of supervisors encourage the reinvigoration of the Crisis Care Committee by October 1, 2025 made up of the MLPD Chief of Police, the Director of the Mono County Department of Behavioral Health, a representative of Mammoth Hospital and the Sheriff's Department to focus on cross-training and communication.
4 responses · Mono County Sheriff · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors · Mammoth Hospital
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R2
The grand jury recommends that the board of supervisors encourage the reinvigoration of the Crisis Care Committee by October 1, 2025 made up of the MLPD Chief of Police, the Director of the Mono County Department of Behavioral Health, a representative of Mammoth Hospital and the Sheriff's Department to focus on cross-training and communication.
4 responses · Mono County Sheriff · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors · Mammoth Hospital
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 5
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Sheriff
Agency position unclearProposes Board invitations to MLPD and Mammoth Hospital to participate in the Behavioral Health Advisory Board; identifies its next meeting as August 11, 2025.
Read official response · PDF page 7Mono County Behavioral Health Director
Agency plans to implementWill participate in a jointly requested committee but says Behavioral Health cannot compel other agencies to participate.
Read official response · PDF page 11Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementWill direct Behavioral Health to contact MOU partners and initiate the agreement’s meetings in fiscal year 2025–2026.
Read official response · PDF page 26Mammoth Hospital
Agency plans to implementWill send a representative when the committee is reinvigorated.
Read official response · PDF page 27Recommendation R3
The grand jury recommends that the Mono County Board of Supervisors encourage the Department of Health to provide MLPD officers training on de-escalation and assessment, similar to what they would provide their own employees, starting by January, 2026.
2 responses · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation R3
The grand jury recommends that the Mono County Board of Supervisors encourage the Department of Health to provide MLPD officers training on de-escalation and assessment, similar to what they would provide their own employees, starting by January, 2026.
2 responses · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 5
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Behavioral Health Director
Agency plans to implementOffers training on Behavioral Health’s role and techniques if requested by MLPD; identifies POST training as an alternative suited to officers.
Read official response · PDF page 11Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agency plans to implementOffers training on Behavioral Health’s role and techniques if requested by MLPD; identifies POST training as an alternative suited to officers.
Read official response · PDF page 26Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail
Recommendations
4 recommendations
Recommendation 1
Expedite construction of the new jail facility to limit the increasing risk to public safety due to deteriorating conditions.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation 1
Expedite construction of the new jail facility to limit the increasing risk to public safety due to deteriorating conditions.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 2
Permanent linkOfficial response
Mono County Sheriff
Agency position unclearAgrees and says Public Works is doing everything in its power to move the project forward.
Read official response · PDF page 1Recommendation 2
Continue maintenance management of the existing jail facility ensuring security is not compromised.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation 2
Continue maintenance management of the existing jail facility ensuring security is not compromised.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 3
Permanent linkOfficial response
Mono County Sheriff
Agency position unclearAgrees and supports Public Works’ efforts to keep the aging facility functioning.
Read official response · PDF page 1Recommendation 3
Consider offering housing assistance or other incentives to attract and retain qualified staff.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation 3
Consider offering housing assistance or other incentives to attract and retain qualified staff.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 3
Permanent linkOfficial response
Mono County Sheriff
Agency says implementedAgrees, cites County-owned workforce apartments in Bridgeport, and reports approval of hiring and recruitment incentives for four correctional deputies.
Read official response · PDF page 1Recommendation 4
Secure additional funding to support and accelerate the new facility’s completion.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide details
Recommendation 4
Secure additional funding to support and accelerate the new facility’s completion.
1 response · Mono County Sheriff
View recommendation and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 3
Permanent linkOfficial response
Mono County Sheriff
Agency declines implementationPartly agrees and partly disagrees, says allocated funding is sufficient, and attributes the timeline to State approvals and building-season constraints.
Read official response · PDF page 2Findings
The jury’s formal findings, with source citations and any recorded responses.
Findings & responses
Showing 20 of 20 findings
Jump to finding
Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness
7 findings
Finding F1
The County regards Cyber Security preparedness as a high priority by taking positive actions to continuously improve its maturity posture resulting in a lower risk of cyber security incidents.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F1
The County regards Cyber Security preparedness as a high priority by taking positive actions to continuously improve its maturity posture resulting in a lower risk of cyber security incidents.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Finding F2
The Payment Card Industry (PCI) self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) process inadequately involves IT resulting in a lack of IT awareness of the PCI Compliance process and errors on attestation reporting.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F2
The Payment Card Industry (PCI) self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) process inadequately involves IT resulting in a lack of IT awareness of the PCI Compliance process and errors on attestation reporting.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Partly agrees and partly disagrees, explaining that third-party processors and Finance manage payments while IT should assist with assessment and security review.
Read official response · PDF page 3Mono County Board of Supervisors
Partly agrees and partly disagrees, explaining that third-party processors and Finance manage payments while IT should assist with assessment and security review.
Read official response · PDF page 11Finding F3
The lack of immutable backups results in increased risk of disruption to important County operations due to a ransomware attack.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F3
The lack of immutable backups results in increased risk of disruption to important County operations due to a ransomware attack.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agrees that missing immutable backups increase disruption risk and proposes researching practical options with departments.
Read official response · PDF page 3Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agrees that missing immutable backups increase disruption risk and proposes researching practical options with departments.
Read official response · PDF page 11Finding F4
Computing devices, no longer supported by the vendor, are present in the environment resulting in an increased risk of cybersecurity vulnerabilities and attacks.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F4
Computing devices, no longer supported by the vendor, are present in the environment resulting in an increased risk of cybersecurity vulnerabilities and attacks.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agrees that end-of-life devices remain and describes funding and staffing limits within the Technology Refresh/Internal Service Fund established in 2014.
Read official response · PDF page 4Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agrees that end-of-life devices remain and describes funding and staffing limits within the Technology Refresh/Internal Service Fund established in 2014.
Read official response · PDF page 12Finding F5
The lack of consistent periodic external penetration testing and vulnerability scans results in unknown potential exploits which increases the risk of cybersecurity incidents.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F5
The lack of consistent periodic external penetration testing and vulnerability scans results in unknown potential exploits which increases the risk of cybersecurity incidents.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agrees with the testing gap, describes existing 24/7 monitoring, and proposes additional testing and vendor relationships.
Read official response · PDF page 5Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agrees with the testing gap, describes existing 24/7 monitoring, and proposes additional testing and vendor relationships.
Read official response · PDF page 13Finding F6
Important Cyber Security projects and initiatives have not begun or are lagging due to insufficient staffing.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F6
Important Cyber Security projects and initiatives have not begun or are lagging due to insufficient staffing.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agrees that staffing is insufficient, reports a Chief Information Security Officer hired in March 2025, and plans work with Human Resources on a Cyber Security Analyst position. Also anticipates losses linked to the County’s remote-work change.
Read official response · PDF page 5Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agrees that staffing is insufficient, reports a Chief Information Security Officer hired in March 2025, and plans work with Human Resources on a Cyber Security Analyst position.
Read official response · PDF page 13Finding F7
Quarterly cyber security training is taking place with noteworthy results. However, there’s a lack of visibility to compliance measurements among County executives.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F7
Quarterly cyber security training is taking place with noteworthy results. However, there’s a lack of visibility to compliance measurements among County executives.
2 responses · Mono County Information Technology Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Information Technology Director
Agrees that training results have not been brought to the Board and proposes quarterly reporting to supervisors and department heads, with sensitive vulnerabilities discussed separately.
Read official response · PDF page 6Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agrees that training results have not been brought to the Board and proposes quarterly reporting to supervisors and department heads, with sensitive vulnerabilities discussed separately.
Read official response · PDF page 14Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
4 findings
Finding F1
Mono LAFCO’s failure to adhere to California statutory law has resulted in the inability to make informed decisions about local Special District organization.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F1
Mono LAFCO’s failure to adhere to California statutory law has resulted in the inability to make informed decisions about local Special District organization.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Partly agrees and partly disagrees. Acknowledges delayed reviews but says organizational decisions use detailed proposal reports and disputes the claim that every sphere and service review requires an update every five years.
Read official response · PDF page 3Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Partly agrees and partly disagrees. Acknowledges delayed reviews but says organizational decisions use detailed proposal reports and disputes the claim that every sphere and service review requires an update every five years.
Read official response · PDF page 12Finding F2
Mono LAFCO’s failure to assess Special District performance results in the inability to fully understand if the Special District’s service delivery is meeting the needs of the community they serve.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F2
Mono LAFCO’s failure to assess Special District performance results in the inability to fully understand if the Special District’s service delivery is meeting the needs of the community they serve.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Disagrees that routine performance oversight is LAFCO’s responsibility, distinguishing service reviews and organizational decisions from day-to-day district operations.
Read official response · PDF page 4Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Disagrees that routine performance oversight is LAFCO’s responsibility, distinguishing service reviews and organizational decisions from day-to-day district operations.
Read official response · PDF page 14Finding F3
Mono LAFCO’s failure to understand and efficiently exercise its authority has delayed organizational decisions needed to address performance issues.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F3
Mono LAFCO’s failure to understand and efficiently exercise its authority has delayed organizational decisions needed to address performance issues.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Disagrees, stating that no delayed organizational decisions are known and that LAFCO lacks authority over day-to-day district operations.
Read official response · PDF page 5Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Disagrees, stating that no delayed organizational decisions are known and that LAFCO lacks authority over day-to-day district operations.
Read official response · PDF page 14Finding F4
Mono LAFCO's commissioners receive rudimentary training on their broad responsibilities and roles resulting in a lack of pro-active oversight and decision making.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F4
Mono LAFCO's commissioners receive rudimentary training on their broad responsibilities and roles resulting in a lack of pro-active oversight and decision making.
2 responses · Mono LAFCO Executive Officer · Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · PDF page 7
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono LAFCO Executive Officer
Partly agrees that training is introductory but disputes that training determines whether the Commission operates proactively; favors targeted instruction and continued training.
Read official response · PDF page 5Mono Local Agency Formation Commission
Partly agrees that training is introductory but disputes that training determines whether the Commission operates proactively; favors targeted instruction and continued training.
Read official response · PDF page 14Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes
4 findings
Finding F1
The MLPD regards the safety, health and well-being of Mammoth Lakes residents and visitors as a high priority by taking actions to continuously train on, follow and improve its focus on positive detainment and arrest processes
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F1
The MLPD regards the safety, health and well-being of Mammoth Lakes residents and visitors as a high priority by taking actions to continuously train on, follow and improve its focus on positive detainment and arrest processes
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 4
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Finding F2
The Mono County Correctional Officers state that they have a positive relationship with the MLPD officers and that procedures are well known and followed.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F2
The Mono County Correctional Officers state that they have a positive relationship with the MLPD officers and that procedures are well known and followed.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 5
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Finding F3
The limited communication and coordination between Mono County Behavioral Health and MLPD may result in the improper handling of arrestees leading to increased risks to the officers and public.
4 responses · Mono County Sheriff · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors · Mammoth Hospital
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F3
The limited communication and coordination between Mono County Behavioral Health and MLPD may result in the improper handling of arrestees leading to increased risks to the officers and public.
4 responses · Mono County Sheriff · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors · Mammoth Hospital
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 5
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Sheriff
Disagrees and explains several possible interpretations, distinguishing criminal arrests from health-related temporary detentions and citing HIPAA restrictions.
Read official response · PDF page 5Mono County Behavioral Health Director
Partly agrees and partly disagrees, distinguishes Behavioral Health’s assessment role from armed law enforcement, and describes referral procedures under the Mobile Crisis Response MOU.
Read official response · PDF page 9Mono County Board of Supervisors
Partly agrees and partly disagrees, distinguishes Behavioral Health’s assessment role from armed law enforcement, and describes referral procedures under the Mobile Crisis Response MOU.
Read official response · PDF page 24Mammoth Hospital
Says the hospital has no response to this finding at this time.
Read official response · PDF page 27Finding F4
Due to the requirements of HIPAA Compliance, there is no mechanism for the Department of Behavioral Health to "close the loop" with the MLPD after a potential 5150 hold incident is vacated. The police are not notified of the cause which hinders their ability to understand the outcomes and be better able to serve the public.
4 responses · Mono County Sheriff · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors · Mammoth Hospital
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding F4
Due to the requirements of HIPAA Compliance, there is no mechanism for the Department of Behavioral Health to "close the loop" with the MLPD after a potential 5150 hold incident is vacated. The police are not notified of the cause which hinders their ability to understand the outcomes and be better able to serve the public.
4 responses · Mono County Sheriff · Mono County Behavioral Health Director · Mono County Board of Supervisors · Mammoth Hospital
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · PDF page 5
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Mono County Sheriff
Agrees, stating that discharge and transfer details are protected health information and that law enforcement is not entitled to those details.
Read official response · PDF page 6Mono County Behavioral Health Director
Agrees about limits on individual-case feedback, offers aggregate annual data, and says 2025 referral results will be sent to MLPD in January 2026.
Read official response · PDF page 10Mono County Board of Supervisors
Agrees about limits on individual-case feedback, offers aggregate annual data, and says 2025 referral results will be sent to MLPD in January 2026.
Read official response · PDF page 25Mammoth Hospital
Says the hospital has no response to this finding at this time.
Read official response · PDF page 27Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail
Observations and Findings — Facility Condition
1 finding
Finding Facility Condition
The current jail is outdated and deteriorating. Jail door hardware is failing; replacement parts are no longer manufactured and are being redistributed within the facility to maintain functionality. Plumbing issues—particularly drain line blockages in the laundry area—are persistent due to aging infrastructure.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding Facility Condition
The current jail is outdated and deteriorating. Jail door hardware is failing; replacement parts are no longer manufactured and are being redistributed within the facility to maintain functionality. Plumbing issues—particularly drain line blockages in the laundry area—are persistent due to aging infrastructure.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 1
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail
Observations and Findings — Staffing
1 finding
Finding Staffing
Staffing levels have remained relatively constant but are insufficient for optimal operation. Recruitment challenges stem from the region’s harsh winters and a lack of affordable housing.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding Staffing
Staffing levels have remained relatively constant but are insufficient for optimal operation. Recruitment challenges stem from the region’s harsh winters and a lack of affordable housing.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 2
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail
Observations and Findings — Inmate Management
1 finding
Finding Inmate Management
Inmate population has been managed conservatively to alleviate staffing constraints.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding Inmate Management
Inmate population has been managed conservatively to alleviate staffing constraints.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 2
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail
Observations and Findings — Safety and Compliance
1 finding
Finding Safety and Compliance
Fire safety protocols appear to be followed, including annual fire drills and proper maintenance of fire extinguishers.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding Safety and Compliance
Fire safety protocols appear to be followed, including annual fire drills and proper maintenance of fire extinguishers.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 2
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail
Observations and Findings — Recreation and Education
1 finding
Finding Recreation and Education
A modest library and board games are available to inmates; however, the collection is minimal and outdated.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide details
Finding Recreation and Education
A modest library and board games are available to inmates; however, the collection is minimal and outdated.
No response recorded
View finding and responsesHide detailsJury report: Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · PDF page 2
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Questions
Editorial discussion prompts inspired by the reports. These are separate from the jury’s formal findings and recommendations.
Civic question
How should the County prioritize backups, equipment replacement, and recurring security testing?
Supporting report
Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · Findings F3–F5
Civic question
What shared process would make Finance, IT, and payment-processing departments accountable for accurate annual assessments?
Supporting report
Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · Recommendations R2–R3
Civic question
What staffing and training-compliance information would help officials track cybersecurity progress without exposing sensitive details?
Supporting report
Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · Recommendations R7–R8
Civic question
How should LAFCO explain its review priorities, schedules, and funding needs to the public?
Supporting report
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · Recommendations R2 and R5–R7
Civic question
What should commissioner training explain about LAFCO’s powers, limits, and choices concerning district organization?
Supporting report
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) · Finding F4 and Recommendation R1
Civic question
What forum would best sustain communication among police, Behavioral Health, the Sheriff, and Mammoth Hospital?
Supporting report
Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · Recommendation R2
Civic question
What shared training or aggregate information could help agencies understand crisis outcomes without disclosing individual patient details?
Supporting report
Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes · Finding F4 and Recommendation R3
Civic question
What milestones and budget updates would make the replacement-jail project easier to follow?
Supporting report
Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · Recommendation 4 and New Jail Construction Update
Civic question
What maintenance and recruitment measures should receive priority while the existing jail remains in use?
Supporting report
Annual Inspection of the Mono County Jail · Recommendations 2–3
Related coverage
Mono Superior Court
Official Grand Jury reports and responses
Mono Superior Court
Official report and response archive
Board of State and Community Corrections
BSCC unannounced inspection supplied with the Sheriff’s response
Sources
Original reports and response documents provide the evidence behind this cycle’s findings, recommendations, and discussions.
Response available
Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness
Response available
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
Response available
Mammoth Lakes Police Department Detainment and Arrest Processes
Response available