Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R7

Recommendation R7

The grand jury recommends the Board of Supervisors instruct the Director of IT to assess the staffing and capacity demands needed to reasonably support Information Technology’s Cyber Security roadmap for the purpose of submitting such staffing in its next fiscal year budget. Recommendation to be completed by 10/01/2025.

Jury report: Mono County Cybersecurity Preparedness · PDF page 8

Permanent link

Official responses

Mono County Information Technology Director

Agency plans to implement

Agrees to assess staffing and develop a Cyber Security Analyst allocation and job description; personnel requests are to be included in fiscal year 2026–2027 proposals. Says the full assessment can occur after September 11, 2025.

Read official response · PDF page 8

Engages the staffing assessment and budget submission, but the response points to the following fiscal-year proposal rather than clearly committing to the jury’s October 1 deadline.

  • Assess IT staffing needs and include required personnel requests in fiscal year 2026–2027 proposals. Owner: Mono County Information Technology Director. Timing: Fiscal year 2026–2027 budget proposals.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Mono County Board of Supervisors

Agency plans to implement

Agrees to assess staffing and develop a Cyber Security Analyst allocation and job description; personnel requests are to be included in fiscal year 2026–2027 proposals.

Read official response · PDF page 16

Engages the staffing assessment and budget submission, but the response points to the following fiscal-year proposal rather than clearly committing to the jury’s October 1 deadline.

  • Assess IT staffing needs and include required personnel requests in fiscal year 2026–2027 proposals. Owner: Mono County Board of Supervisors. Timing: Fiscal year 2026–2027 budget proposals.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions