Response says
Partially disagrees: IOC approves the next plan, followed by separate Board review and approval.
What should residents consider about Finding BOS2602-F21: F21: IAD implements its annual audit plan without prior Board input or approval, eliminating the Board's opportunity to influence audit priorities before audit work has begun, inconsistent with IIA Principle 8 and IIA Standards 8.1 and 9.4, which collectively require that the board review and approve the risk-based audit plan before implementation., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partially disagrees: IOC approves the next plan, followed by separate Board review and approval.
Audit analysis
Directly disputes lack of prior input/approval through an asserted sequence; no dated plan or approval record is supplied.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Directly disputes lack of prior input/approval through an asserted sequence; no dated plan or approval record is supplied.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.