Response says
Partially disagrees: IOC reviews activities and approves plans; acknowledges highest-risk discussion could be more explicit.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOS2602-F20
F20: The IOC is not provided with information to determine whether proposed annual audit plans address the County’s highest-risk areas, as required by IIA Principle 8, IIA Standards 8.1 and 9.4.
What should residents consider about Finding BOS2602-F20: F20: The IOC is not provided with information to determine whether proposed annual audit plans address the County’s highest-risk areas, as required by IIA Principle 8, IIA Standards 8.1 and 9.4., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors; Contra Costa County Auditor-ControllerAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Separates existing oversight from the admitted risk-discussion gap with concrete assertions; no particular plan or meeting record is identified.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
Separates existing oversight from the admitted risk-discussion gap with concrete assertions; no particular plan or meeting record is identified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...