Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOS2602-F22

F22: Findings F4, F10, F11, F12, F18, F19, F20, F21, and F26 collectively establish that the IOC and Board do not fulfill the audit oversight responsibilities required by IIA Principle 8 and Standards 8.1 and 15.1, and GAGAS §§3.46 and 6.06 — including charter approval, prospective audit plan approval, ongoing engagement, risk-based planning oversight, and direct receipt of audit reports.

What should residents consider about Finding BOS2602-F22: F22: Findings F4, F10, F11, F12, F18, F19, F20, F21, and F26 collectively establish that the IOC and Board do not fulfill the audit oversight responsibilities required by IIA Principle 8 and Standards 8.1 and 15.1, and GAGAS §§3.46 and 6.06 — including charter approval, prospective audit plan approval, ongoing engagement, risk-based planning oversight, and direct receipt of audit reports., and the County’s response?

Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors; Contra Costa County Auditor-ControllerAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees with the finding without additional explanation.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement engages F22; the response adds no finding-specific reasoning or independently checkable support. Agreement is not independent verification.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

2/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

Explicit agreement engages F22; the response adds no finding-specific reasoning or independently checkable support. Agreement is not independent verification.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is