Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1

Staffing, workload, and burnout risk

What should residents consider about Finding F1: Staffing, workload, and burnout risk, and the County’s response?

Calaveras County Board of Supervisors and Calaveras County Sheriff’s OfficeAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

The Board disagrees wholly, compares local caseloads to the SB 2030 workload study, and describes support for staff.

Audit analysis

It supplies concrete local averages, benchmark figures, and a study URL with page references. These address its position without independently proving staffing adequacy.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

It supplies concrete local averages, benchmark figures, and a study URL with page references. These address its position without independently proving staffing adequacy.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is