Response says
The Board disagrees, citing responsive assistance and regular communication. The Sheriff explicitly neither agrees nor disagrees and says its responses depend on requests received.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4
Shared understanding of field-security needs
What should residents consider about Finding F4: Shared understanding of field-security needs, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of Supervisors and Calaveras County Sheriff’s OfficeAudit assessment: Unclear
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The Board’s position and explanation appear on page 92; the Sheriff’s different position and operational explanation appear on pages 93–94. Both are clearly attributable, but a single numeric score cannot be mapped to both respondents without concealing the difference.
Finding-response score unavailable
Finding mapping ambiguous
Two distinct agency responses share this finding: Board disagreement on page 92 and Sheriff non-position on page 93. The single-score content field cannot represent both agency positions faithfully.
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...