Response says
The Board disagrees wholly, stating that its contract procedures are legally required.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
Contracting delays in access to care
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Contracting delays in access to care, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of Supervisors and Calaveras County Sheriff’s OfficeAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response does not explain whether legally required procedures cause delays or affect clients, and identifies no specific law or timing evidence.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
2/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
The response does not explain whether legally required procedures cause delays or affect clients, and identifies no specific law or timing evidence.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...