Response says
MJUSD partially disagrees but acknowledges historical reliance on qualitative rather than a formal centralized metric system. It will develop surveys, activity logs and diversion measures.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding MJUSD-F3
The SRO program does not utilize standardized performance metrics or a centralized data-driven evaluation framework to assess effectiveness across school sites.
What should residents consider about Finding MJUSD-F3: The SRO program does not utilize standardized performance metrics or a centralized data-driven evaluation framework to assess effectiveness across school sites., and the County’s response?
Yuba County Sheriff; Wheatland Union High School District Board and Superintendent; Marysville Joint Unified School District Board President and SuperintendentAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The disagreement label and qualitative-evaluation admission are both retained. No completion date is stated for the new framework.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
Partial disagreement is explicit, but the disputed portion is not identified: the explanation largely acknowledges the finding. Proposed indicators are concrete but no existing evaluation source is cited.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...