Response says
MJUSD disagrees, distinguishes administrator discipline from safety-related searches and protective behavioral-health support, and supplies an enforcement boundary matrix.
What should residents consider about Finding MJUSD-F2: The SRO program operates with overlapping school-based and law enforcement response frameworks for discipline, behavioral health and crime response., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
MJUSD disagrees, distinguishes administrator discipline from safety-related searches and protective behavioral-health support, and supplies an enforcement boundary matrix.
Audit analysis
This is MJUSD’s described operational boundary, not a legal determination that every intervention follows it.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Explicit disagreement identifies disputed overlap and explains discipline, health and criminal boundaries. Education Code and the included matrix provide checkable support.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.