Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F4

Finding F4

The Board of Supervisors’ use of the Board Reports agenda section to deliver an extensive presentation criticizing the CDD immediately prior to the closed-session evaluation of the CDD Director created the perception of improper public discussion of personnel matters, undermined public confidence in Brown Act compliance and fair governance practices, and addressed matters not properly agendized while denying the public and the department a meaningful opportunity to comment or respond.

Jury report: Behind the Devastation: Tuolumne County Community Development Department · PDF page 46

Permanent link

Official response

Tuolumne County

The response disagrees that the presentation constituted improper personnel action, inadequate agendization, or denial of an opportunity to respond.

Read official response · PDF page 4

The response states its position and gives an explanation, so it directly engages the finding. This assessment addresses responsiveness only, not factual or legal correctness.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions