Finding F2
Stanislaus County CBOCs frequently do not have appropriate membership as required by Ed Code. Some CBOCs lack members representing each qualifying group, and/or members are regularly serving terms longer than specified in the bylaws.
Jury report: Obligations, Obstacles, and Opportunities in School Bond Oversight · PDF page 64
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Hughson Unified School District
Agrees about the missing taxpayer representative and describes recruitment notices on June 29 and June 30, 2026.
Read official response · PDF page 1Recruitment explanation continues on page 2; does not discuss the term-limit proposition.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Salida Union School District
Partially agrees, identifies six of seven members and a missing local-business representative, and promises membership review and recruitment.
Read official response · PDF page 2Does not explain a position on long-serving members or term-limit compliance.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Turlock Unified School District
Agrees, acknowledges past membership challenges, and says it is currently compliant; administrative support will align membership and terms.
Read official response · PDF page 1Engages both membership and term requirements but supplies no identified compliance record in the finding response.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Keyes Union School District
Quotes F2; says under R2a that a taxpayer representative was appointed June 15, 2026, and under R2b that the newly formed committee has no current term-limit issue.
Read official response · PDF page 2Finding position is implied by two recommendation responses rather than expressly mapped agreement or disagreement.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Ceres Unified School District
Partially disagrees: says seven members were appointed February 2025 and that the jury could not determine category representation or term lengths, not that it established violations.
Read official response · PDF page 1Reasoning continues on page 2; promises public confirmation of categories and terms.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Patterson Joint Unified School District
Agrees as to composition at the review date; says it posted the senior representative vacancy June 24, 2026 and received an application.
Read official response · PDF page 1Reports recruitment rather than completed appointment and does not discuss term limits.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Stanislaus Union School District
Partially agrees about six of seven members and a missing taxpayer representative; says the report identifies no current term-limit violation and will review terms.
Read official response · PDF page 2Explains both category deficiency and term-limit interpretation.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Denair Unified School District
Agrees as to membership: three of seven required members at the review date; describes ongoing recruitment challenges.
Read official response · PDF page 2Clearly limits its agreement to membership rather than claiming a term-limit response.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District
Partially agrees; says the jury could not determine compliance because no current membership list was located, and promises category and term review.
Read official response · PDF page 2Explanation continues on page 3, identifying up-to-eleven membership and two-year/two-term bylaws.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Waterford Unified School District
Acknowledges the countywide finding and says the report found Waterford compliant with membership requirements.
Read official response · PDF page 2No express agreement or disagreement; does not separately explain term-limit compliance.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.