Response says
Confirms approximately $510,000 lower water charges and $204,000 lower wastewater charges, but says savings are not earmarked for a particular use.
What should residents consider about Finding F2: When the City updated its Cost Allocation Plan in 2024, reduced allocation of indirect costs left approximately $714,000 in the Enterprise Funds to be used for systems maintenance and capital improvements., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Confirms approximately $510,000 lower water charges and $204,000 lower wastewater charges, but says savings are not earmarked for a particular use.
Audit analysis
Specifies the disagreement over use of savings and explains possible operating, capital, reserve or rate effects, citing the 2024 allocation plan and its cost bases.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Specifies the disagreement over use of savings and explains possible operating, capital, reserve or rate effects, citing the 2024 allocation plan and its cost bases.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.