Response says
Partially agrees: denies a correlation with odors but accepts blockages, equipment problems and treatment costs.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
The food waste from garbage disposals and non-flushable material from toilets exacerbate the odors and costs to treat the sewage.
What should residents consider about Finding F2: The food waste from garbage disposals and non-flushable material from toilets exacerbate the odors and costs to treat the sewage., and the County’s response?
Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District Board of TrusteesResponse dated 2026-07-22Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The odor and cost components are explicitly separated, with a specific reason for partial disagreement. This is not independent proof of causation.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The odor and cost components are explicitly separated, with a specific reason for partial disagreement. This is not independent proof of causation.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...