Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Report overview
Response synthesis and audit

District Board response on wastewater odors

The July 21-approved response explains initial outreach and odor uncertainty, disputes disposal-related odor causation, and distinguishes elected governance from operational expertise.

Official response PDFOfficial report PDF

Response by Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District Board of Trustees · 2026-07-22

1

Addressed

6

Partially addressed

0

Not addressed

0

Unclear

County's stated disposition

These categories reflect the County's response to each recommendation, separate from this audit's assessment.

0

Implemented

0

Will be implemented

0

Requires further analysis

0

Will not be implemented

3

Unclear

How to read this audit

Four findings retain F1a/F1b separately. Partial agreement is not treated as a precise dispute explanation when the response does not identify an accepted and disputed claim. Recommendation discussion does not demonstrate completed future improvements.

Commitments

Actions stated in the response

These are commitments extracted from the County's response. They describe what the response says will happen; they do not verify that implementation occurred.

2

Extracted commitments

0

Definite or bounded timing

0

Conditional timing

2

No timeframe

R1 · No timeframe stated

Continue improving community outreach and communication.

No target date stated

R2 · No timeframe stated

Continue investing in education about appropriate wastewater disposal.

No target date stated

Item-by-item review

Findings and recommendations

Assessments describe whether the response engages each cited item. Finding scores separately describe statutory-elements completeness under California Penal Code § 933.05(a) and public usefulness. They do not independently verify the response or constitute a legal conclusion.

Showing 7 of 7 items

finding · F1a

The language of the district outreach at the onset and during the construction project was broad and vague. This left residents unclear on the impact.

Audit: Partially addressed

Response says

Partially agrees; acknowledges high-level initial summaries and explains it did not anticipate prolonged odors or equipment overhaul.

Audit analysis

The initial communication limitation is acknowledged, but the reply does not clearly identify which portion of the broad-and-vague finding is disputed, rather than explain why it happened.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The initial communication limitation is acknowledged, but the reply does not clearly identify which portion of the broad-and-vague finding is disputed, rather than explain why it happened.

Scoring confidence: medium

Report page 9Response page 1
Discuss finding and response

finding · F1b

The District’s initial public notice in March 2024 underestimated the offensiveness of the odors and understated the timeframe, adding to the public’s distrust.

Audit: Partially addressed

Response says

Partially agrees, attributing the original estimate to the contractor and describing later complaints, treatment and updates.

Audit analysis

The reply gives a narrative and explanation but does not clearly separate accepted underestimation from a disputed timeframe or public-trust claim.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The reply gives a narrative and explanation but does not clearly separate accepted underestimation from a disputed timeframe or public-trust claim.

Scoring confidence: medium

Report page 9Response page 2
Discuss finding and response

finding · F2

The food waste from garbage disposals and non-flushable material from toilets exacerbate the odors and costs to treat the sewage.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Partially agrees: denies a correlation with odors but accepts blockages, equipment problems and treatment costs.

Audit analysis

The odor and cost components are explicitly separated, with a specific reason for partial disagreement. This is not independent proof of causation.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The odor and cost components are explicitly separated, with a specific reason for partial disagreement. This is not independent proof of causation.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 9Response page 2
Discuss finding and response

finding · F3

During a Board of Trustees meeting held on December 10, 2024, the Jury observed a lack of industry expertise demonstrated by board members. This failure contributed to the Board’s inability to ask constructive questions and relay accurate information to the public. The public expressed a similar frustration with the Board’s lack of operational knowledge.

Audit: Partially addressed

Response says

Partially agrees that trustees are not industry experts; explains their policy role and reliance on qualified staff.

Audit analysis

The role distinction explains the response, but does not clearly resolve the finding’s specific claim that trustees could not ask constructive questions or convey accurate information.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The role distinction explains the response, but does not clearly resolve the finding’s specific claim that trustees could not ask constructive questions or convey accurate information.

Scoring confidence: medium

Report page 9Response page 2
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R1

For future nuisance alerts, the District offer more specifics and routine updates in their outreach communications.

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Agrees with better alerts and says outreach has increased and continues improving.

Audit analysis

Agreement and general current outreach do not clearly establish that future alerts will include the requested specifics and routine updates, or supply a statutory implementation disposition.

Extracted commitments

Continue improving community outreach and communication.

Responsible party
Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District
Timing
No timeframe stated
Report page 9Response page 3

recommendation · R2

The District enhance the ongoing campaign by January 2027, to educate the public about what items should not be disposed of in the sewer system.

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Partially agrees, citing Baywise, disposal webpages and quarterly newsletters.

Audit analysis

Existing education is described, but the reply does not identify a defined enhancement or adopt the January 2027 milestone. Continuing investment is not the same as completing the requested change.

Extracted commitments

Continue investing in education about appropriate wastewater disposal.

Responsible party
Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District
Timing
No timeframe stated
Report page 9Response page 3

recommendation · R3

The Board of Trustees add an industry expert to the Board and familiarize themselves with basic operations of the District Treatment Plant by July 1, 2027.

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Partially agrees, explains the ex officio elected membership, and describes support for AB 912.

Audit analysis

The response explains why an expert cannot simply be added under the current structure. It does not adopt July 1, 2027 completion or clearly address trustee familiarization; legislative support is not enacted governance reform.

Report page 9Response page 3