Response says
Partially agrees, attributing the original estimate to the contractor and describing later complaints, treatment and updates.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1b
The District’s initial public notice in March 2024 underestimated the offensiveness of the odors and understated the timeframe, adding to the public’s distrust.
What should residents consider about Finding F1b: The District’s initial public notice in March 2024 underestimated the offensiveness of the odors and understated the timeframe, adding to the public’s distrust., and the County’s response?
Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District Board of TrusteesResponse dated 2026-07-22Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The reply gives a narrative and explanation but does not clearly separate accepted underestimation from a disputed timeframe or public-trust claim.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The reply gives a narrative and explanation but does not clearly separate accepted underestimation from a disputed timeframe or public-trust claim.
Scoring confidence: medium
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...