Response says
Wholly disagrees, citing an approved Shasta agreement and discussions with Marin.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3
At the time of this report, Solano County does not lease inmate bed space to other counties, which negatively impacts metrics and revenue.
What should residents consider about Finding F3: At the time of this report, Solano County does not lease inmate bed space to other counties, which negatively impacts metrics and revenue., and the County’s response?
Solano County Sheriff-CoronerResponse dated 2026-08-18Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
A specific agreement and operational constraints explain the dispute. A current agreement does not fully establish what leasing existed at the report’s earlier reference date or prove claimed available capacity.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
A specific agreement and operational constraints explain the dispute. A current agreement does not fully establish what leasing existed at the report’s earlier reference date or prove claimed available capacity.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...