Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Report overview
Response synthesis and audit

Sheriff response on Claybank

The Sheriff disputes financial and staffing assumptions, reports emptied housing and continuing kitchen operations, rejects a hiring freeze and new citizen committee, and describes leasing and independent cost analysis.

Official response PDFOfficial report PDF

Response by Solano County Sheriff-Coroner · 2026-08-18

7

Addressed

4

Partially addressed

0

Not addressed

0

Unclear

County's stated disposition

These categories reflect the County's response to each recommendation, separate from this audit's assessment.

1

Implemented

0

Will be implemented

0

Requires further analysis

3

Will not be implemented

3

Unclear

How to read this audit

This is the Sheriff’s response, not a final Board response. Partial implementation and Board-controlled decisions are not converted into completed closure. Projected savings, reported moves and staffing figures remain source claims.

Commitments

Actions stated in the response

These are commitments extracted from the County's response. They describe what the response says will happen; they do not verify that implementation occurred.

4

Extracted commitments

1

Definite or bounded timing

2

Conditional timing

1

No timeframe

R1B · Conditional timing

Continue evaluating non-housing uses and maintaining kitchen and operational support functions.

As needs and resources allow, pending Board decisions on the facility’s future.

R3 · Conditional timing

Explore additional intercounty bed leasing where operationally feasible.

As staffing, classification needs and operational capacity allow.

R4A · No timeframe stated

Initiate an independent full-cost daily-bed-rate analysis using four county comparators.

No target date stated

R4B · Bounded timeframe

Pursue NCCHC accreditation, including a planned survey visit.

Surveyors are expected in fall 2026; no exact date or guaranteed accreditation is stated.

Item-by-item review

Findings and recommendations

Assessments describe whether the response engages each cited item. Finding scores separately describe statutory-elements completeness under California Penal Code § 933.05(a) and public usefulness. They do not independently verify the response or constitute a legal conclusion.

Showing 11 of 11 items

finding · F1

Proposed renovation of the older Claybank facility is estimated to cost over $13 million dollars and does not meet the CFIP’s standard of “improving efficiency and operations improvement.” Such an unnecessary expenditure would negatively impact the County’s finances. As of April 4, 2026, the Claybank facility had an extremely low occupancy percentage of 15% with two other facilities available. Closing Claybank would increase the overall jail occupancy rating to 47% and still be well below 100%.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Partially disagrees: separate capital projects, operational constraints and the June 10 housing move change the comparison.

Audit analysis

The reply identifies the disputed project characterization and explains why rated occupancy alone is insufficient. It reports a move associated with Justice Center operations; R1B describes the destination differently as Stanton. Neither proves full closure or savings.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The reply identifies the disputed project characterization and explains why rated occupancy alone is insufficient. It reports a move associated with Justice Center operations; R1B describes the destination differently as Stanton. Neither proves full closure or savings.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 7Response page 1
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R1A

The Board of Supervisor reject at its first opportunity the CFIP proposal to renovate the Claybank facility and save the County General Fund over $13 million dollars in capital improvements.

County: Will not be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Will not implement within the Sheriff’s Office because the CFIP is Board-controlled.

Audit analysis

A clear refusal explains authority limits. This cannot substitute for the Board’s response or prove the Board rejected the proposed spending.

Report page 7Response page 2

recommendation · R1B

Solano County close the Claybank facility within a year from the date of this report and reassign inmates and security staff to the other remaining facilities.

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Claims the housing move and staff reassignment are complete, but the kitchen remains open and formal closure awaits County action.

Audit analysis

Partial implementation is specified; no full-closure schedule or replacement kitchen plan is adopted. Further operational use depends on needs, resources and Board decisions.

Extracted commitments

Continue evaluating non-housing uses and maintaining kitchen and operational support functions.

Responsible party
Solano County Sheriff-Coroner
Timing
As needs and resources allow, pending Board decisions on the facility’s future. · Conditional timing
Report page 8Response page 2

recommendation · R1C

Solano County perform a “warm closure” or find alternative suitable uses of the Claybank facility by December 2027.

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Calls the current condition a warm closure while reserving future disposition to County and Board consideration.

Audit analysis

The stated warm-closure activity addresses one requested option, but the response itself labels implementation partial and does not adopt a complete long-term disposition or December 2027 timetable.

Report page 8Response page 2

finding · F2

The Solano County Sheriff’s Office has hired a surplus of Custody Officers, negatively impacting the County’s finances.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Wholly disagrees that officers are surplus, citing hires, separations, promotions and service obligations.

Audit analysis

The disputed surplus claim and financial premise are answered with 64 hires, 53 separations and eight promotions for a claimed net three, alongside vacancies and mandated services. The audit does not validate staffing adequacy.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The disputed surplus claim and financial premise are answered with 64 hires, 53 separations and eight promotions for a claimed net three, alongside vacancies and mandated services. The audit does not validate staffing adequacy.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 8Response page 2
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R2

By July 1, 2027, impose the LAO recommended one-to-three year hiring freeze for custody officers to align security staffing with other neighboring counties, potentially saving the County an additional $3,750,000 per year in FTE costs. A hiring freeze, plus staff attrition, promotions, and retirements would minimize undue layoffs. Reducing Custody officer positions to an acceptable level could provide adequate staffing for 600 inmates.

County: Will not be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Rejects a hiring freeze as unsafe and based on an inapplicable statewide analysis.

Audit analysis

The refusal gives county-specific vacancy, leave and compliance reasons and distinguishes the State-prison LAO analysis from local jail staffing.

Report page 8Response page 3

finding · F3

At the time of this report, Solano County does not lease inmate bed space to other counties, which negatively impacts metrics and revenue.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Wholly disagrees, citing an approved Shasta agreement and discussions with Marin.

Audit analysis

A specific agreement and operational constraints explain the dispute. A current agreement does not fully establish what leasing existed at the report’s earlier reference date or prove claimed available capacity.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

A specific agreement and operational constraints explain the dispute. A current agreement does not fully establish what leasing existed at the report’s earlier reference date or prove claimed available capacity.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 8Response page 3
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R3

Within six months of the date of this report, offer or lease inmate bed space to improve underperforming metrics and generate revenue. The Justice Center and Stanton facilities have sufficient capacity to house all local inmates while also leasing over 500 beds.

County: ImplementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Claims an approved Shasta agreement through June 30, 2028, and ongoing exploration of other leases.

Audit analysis

The response identifies implementation through an agreement, not proof of occupied leased beds, revenue or 500 immediately usable spaces.

Extracted commitments

Explore additional intercounty bed leasing where operationally feasible.

Responsible party
Solano County Sheriff-Coroner
Timing
As staffing, classification needs and operational capacity allow. · Conditional timing
Report page 8Response page 3

finding · F4

The Sheriff’s Office has not engaged outside consultants in the last ten years to review their financial situation, which could lead to perpetuation of the current underperforming situation.

Audit: Partially addressed

Response says

Partially disagrees and says an independent full-cost analysis is being initiated.

Audit analysis

Prospective analysis does not clearly identify the accepted and disputed portions of the finding about the past ten years. Its narrower daily-bed-rate scope also does not establish a completed independent budget review.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

3/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
1/2
Support traceability
1/2

Prospective analysis does not clearly identify the accepted and disputed portions of the finding about the past ten years. Its narrower daily-bed-rate scope also does not establish a completed independent budget review.

Scoring confidence: medium

Report page 9Response page 3
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R4A

Hire an unbiased third-party professional consultant by the end of 2026 to review the Custodial Division budget and make recommendations or suggestions to reduce their budget within three months.

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Claims partial implementation through initiation of an independent bed-rate cost comparison with four counties.

Audit analysis

The reply does not adopt the requested end-of-2026 consultant hire, full budget-review scope or three-month recommendation deadline.

Extracted commitments

Initiate an independent full-cost daily-bed-rate analysis using four county comparators.

Responsible party
Solano County Sheriff-Coroner
Timing
No timeframe stated
Report page 9Response page 4

recommendation · R4B

By March 1, 2027, post position descriptions and interview for volunteer candidates to a citizen oversight committee. The goal being to provide feedback to the Sheriff’s Office about performance, as well as suggestions for improvement. Appoint such committee by July 1, 2027.

County: Will not be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Rejects another oversight committee, citing existing oversight and voluntary health-care accreditation.

Audit analysis

The response gives a clear refusal and institutional reasons. Proposed NCCHC surveys are not an appointed citizen committee or completed accreditation.

Extracted commitments

Pursue NCCHC accreditation, including a planned survey visit.

Responsible party
Solano County Sheriff-Coroner
Timing
Surveyors are expected in fall 2026; no exact date or guaranteed accreditation is stated. · Bounded timeframe
Report page 9Response page 4