Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2

The Solano County Sheriff’s Office has hired a surplus of Custody Officers, negatively impacting the County’s finances.

What should residents consider about Finding F2: The Solano County Sheriff’s Office has hired a surplus of Custody Officers, negatively impacting the County’s finances., and the County’s response?

Solano County Sheriff-CoronerResponse dated 2026-08-18Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Wholly disagrees that officers are surplus, citing hires, separations, promotions and service obligations.

Audit analysis

The disputed surplus claim and financial premise are answered with 64 hires, 53 separations and eight promotions for a claimed net three, alongside vacancies and mandated services. The audit does not validate staffing adequacy.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The disputed surplus claim and financial premise are answered with 64 hires, 53 separations and eight promotions for a claimed net three, alongside vacancies and mandated services. The audit does not validate staffing adequacy.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is