Response says
Agrees current reporting omits factors affecting incident totals.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
Reported data does not clarify discrepancies such as size of household, number of thefts per report, amount of benefits, etc., which leads to possible underreporting of theft.
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Reported data does not clarify discrepancies such as size of household, number of thefts per report, amount of benefits, etc., which leads to possible underreporting of theft., and the County’s response?
Solano County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2026-08-04Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Agreement covers limitations in household, benefit and multiple-theft data; reporting constraints and State parameters are explained without validating all counts.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Agreement covers limitations in household, benefit and multiple-theft data; reporting constraints and State parameters are explained without validating all counts.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...