Response says
The Board wholly disagrees and says Welcome Home staff share exploitation concerns with law enforcement.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5-board
The gaps in data sharing of youths’ at-risk status of exploitation: • leave youth unidentified and vulnerable to further abuse, • lead to delays in providing supportive services in longer term placements, and • make it difficult to locate the youth once they leave the Welcome Homes without authorization
What should residents consider about Finding F5-board: The gaps in data sharing of youths’ at-risk status of exploitation: • leave youth unidentified and vulnerable to further abuse, • lead to delays in providing supportive services in longer term placements, and • make it difficult to locate the youth once they leave the Welcome Homes without authorization, and the County’s response?
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors; California Office of the Foster Care OmbudspersonAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The explanation focuses on law-enforcement sharing; the adjacent R5 response names assessment tools and reports. The wider finding also concerns identification and service delays, which remain only partly covered.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
3/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The explanation focuses on law-enforcement sharing; the adjacent R5 response names assessment tools and reports. The wider finding also concerns identification and service delays, which remain only partly covered.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...