Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, citing youth rights and individualized supervision rather than broad device confiscation.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4-board
CPS fails to apply the Reasonable and Prudent Parent Standard to limit a foster youth’s access to cellular phones and other technology, leaving youth vulnerable to exploitation
What should residents consider about Finding F4-board: CPS fails to apply the Reasonable and Prudent Parent Standard to limit a foster youth’s access to cellular phones and other technology, leaving youth vulnerable to exploitation, and the County’s response?
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors; California Office of the Foster Care OmbudspersonAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies the disputed legal premise, Title 22 and youth rights, explains phones’ safety role and gives a 3–8 p.m. Wi-Fi schedule. This is reasoned engagement, not an independent legal ruling.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response identifies the disputed legal premise, Title 22 and youth rights, explains phones’ safety role and gives a 3–8 p.m. Wi-Fi schedule. This is reasoned engagement, not an independent legal ruling.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...