Response says
The Board partially disagrees: qualitative updates existed, but exploitation-specific quantitative data was not supplied.
What should residents consider about Finding F6-board: Department of Child, Family and Adult Services has failed to include information regarding the sexual exploitation of youth in their Quarterly Reports to the Board of Supervisors, leaving the Supervisors and the public at large, uninformed of potential dangers to vulnerable youth, and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
The Board partially disagrees: qualitative updates existed, but exploitation-specific quantitative data was not supplied.
Audit analysis
The response clearly distinguishes the accepted data gap from disputed absence of all information and names quarterly reporting obligations.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
The response clearly distinguishes the accepted data gap from disputed absence of all information and names quarterly reporting obligations.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.