Response says
The Board partially disagrees, describing Welcome Homes as a safe bridge when specialized placements are unavailable.
What should residents consider about Finding F3-board: The Sacramento Welcome Homes are an inappropriate placement for sexually exploited youth and youth who are at risk of sexual exploitation, because Temporary Shelter Care Facilities are not a therapeutic setting, and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
The Board partially disagrees, describing Welcome Homes as a safe bridge when specialized placements are unavailable.
Audit analysis
The response acknowledges lack of intensive therapeutic treatment and explains its harm-reduction rationale, limited placement capacity and common restraints law. This directly identifies the accepted and disputed scope.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
The response acknowledges lack of intensive therapeutic treatment and explains its harm-reduction rationale, limited placement capacity and common restraints law. This directly identifies the accepted and disputed scope.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.