Response says
Disagrees wholly that the described events establish a leave-law violation.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOARD-F3
Possible violations of FMLA occurred when an employee was removed from a supervisory position in the field, had their work schedule substantially changed, and was reassigned to an undesirable location while they were out on FMLA leave.
What should residents consider about Finding BOARD-F3: Possible violations of FMLA occurred when an employee was removed from a supervisory position in the field, had their work schedule substantially changed, and was reassigned to an undesirable location while they were out on FMLA leave., and the County’s response?
See per-item agency attributionAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Pages 7–8 explain the County’s employment and assignment interpretation; neither party’s legal position is adjudicated by this audit.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Pages 7–8 explain the County’s employment and assignment interpretation; neither party’s legal position is adjudicated by this audit.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...