Response says
Partly disagrees; distinguishes current allocation work from historical weaknesses.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding MILLER-F3
The Cost Allocation Plan utilized from 2018 to present contains serious errors and lack internal controls.
What should residents consider about Finding MILLER-F3: The Cost Allocation Plan utilized from 2018 to present contains serious errors and lack internal controls., and the County’s response?
See per-item agency attributionAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...