Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F6

Finding F6

Given evidence of direct funding from a single contributor, who had a direct interest in the results of a controversial item, there was an appearance of influence on the Board when the item was addressed.

Jury report: Uncapped Influence: Campaign Contributions and Public Trust in Riverside County · PDF page 15

Permanent link

Official response

Riverside County Board of Supervisors

Disagrees with the inference of influence from a contribution.

Read official response · PDF page 6

The Board distinguishes appearance or perception from demonstrated causation and cites disclosure/compliance mechanisms. Disclosure does not independently disprove an appearance concern.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions