Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F4

Finding F4

The chairperson moved an agenda item to the end of the agenda without a motion. This is contrary to Board policy and procedure A-2(10). Afterward twenty-two people, who wanted to speak on the item, did not do so.

Jury report: Uncapped Influence: Campaign Contributions and Public Trust in Riverside County · PDF page 15

Permanent link

Official response

Riverside County Board of Supervisors

Disagrees; says moving a non-time-set item did not require the alleged motion.

Read official response · PDF page 5

The Board cites Policy A-2 and distinguishes scheduling authority from other agenda changes. It cannot establish why twenty-two speakers did not speak and does not independently resolve participation effects.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions