Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F5

Finding F5

HR is failing to take action to ensure compliance with Policy C-25 by the public safety agencies.

Jury report: Policy vs Practice: An Investigation into Riverside County’s Workplace Discrimination Procedures · PDF page 16

Permanent link

Official responses

Riverside County Board of Supervisors, Executive Office and Human Resources

Partly agrees that coordination can improve; disputes that HR has taken no action.

Read official response · PDF page 8

Pages 8–9 describe existing HR practices and acknowledged improvement needs. The acceptance/disagreement distinction is explicit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Riverside County District Attorney’s Office

Agrees.

Read official response · PDF page 3

Agency Finding 3 quotes jury F5. Agreement is clear; no independent support is attached to this answer.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Riverside County Sheriff’s Office

Disagrees wholly.

Read official response · PDF page 3

Pages 3–4 describe HR consultation and reporting practices under the policy. Clear disagreement is not penalized because it conflicts with the jury.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions