Finding F4
Public safety agencies are not following the Policy C-25 requirement to report disciplinary action related to C-25 complaints to HR.
Jury report: Policy vs Practice: An Investigation into Riverside County’s Workplace Discrimination Procedures · PDF page 16
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Riverside County Board of Supervisors, Executive Office and Human Resources
Partly agrees; accepts disposition-documentation gaps, not a duty to transfer all confidential files.
Read official response · PDF page 8The response identifies what information needs reconciliation and disputes broader disclosure of investigative material. This distinguishes disposition reporting from confidential contents.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Riverside County District Attorney’s Office
Agrees with the disciplinary-reporting finding.
Read official response · PDF page 2Agency Finding 2 maps to jury F4 by quotation; pages 2–3 accept the reporting concern. Agreement needs no disagreement explanation.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Riverside County Sheriff’s Office
Disagrees wholly that required disciplinary reporting is omitted.
Read official response · PDF page 2Pages 2–3 describe notification and coordination when C-25 reporting duties are triggered, while distinguishing disciplinary action from proof of a policy violation.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.