Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R2

Recommendation R2

(Finding 2) Within eighteen months of July 1, 2026, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office shall retain an independent correctional health and custodial operations expert to conduct a comprehensive audit of intake screening, medical and mental health services, supervision protocols, and emergency response procedures related to in-custody deaths. The audit findings and corrective action plan shall be publicly reported within ninety days of completion. Fiscal Impact: Independent correctional audits are estimated to cost $250K to $750K, with optional follow-up monitoring costs of $100K to $300K annually depending on scope and duration.

Jury report: After a Decade of Record Deaths in County Jails, the Community Deserves Transparency through Oversight · PDF page 19

Permanent link

Official responses

Riverside County Board of Supervisors

Agency says further analysis needed

Requires further analysis; promises an interim report, not a completed oversight decision.

Read official response · PDF page 11

The template says analysis will not exceed six months from publication, but the body promises a January 2027 interim report and leaves final recommendations for later. These are inconsistent or incomplete completion anchors, not proof that a final analysis or new oversight arrangement is scheduled within the template period.

  • Evaluate the proposed independent correctional health and custodial audit and provide interim status. Owner: Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Timing: Template: no more than six months from report publication; body: January 2027 interim report, final recommendations later without a final date..

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Riverside County Sheriff’s Office

Agency declines implementation

Will not retain the requested additional expert as proposed.

Read official response · PDF page 8

Pages 8–9 rely on existing correctional, court and regulatory review and explain why another audit is considered unnecessary.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions