Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F4

Finding F4

There exists a biased promotional process within Code Enforcement that has been driven by a select few individuals. This process has been given silent approval because of outside relationships that influence the prepping of candidates, selecting the interviewing panel, and guiding the grading processes involved in departmental promotions. Additionally, there have been external communication with HR to manipulate certified hiring lists.

Jury report: Code Enforcement: Not Living up to Code · PDF page 16

Permanent link

Official response

Riverside County Board of Supervisors

Disagrees wholly with the claimed biased promotional process.

Read official response · PDF page 8

Pages 8–10 describe panel selection, hiring safeguards and claimed practice. The detailed rebuttal is a response position, not independently tested personnel evidence.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions