Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F4

Finding F4

Per Standard & Poor’s Global Rating Report, the electric system revenue bond rating has been downgraded from A- in 2007 to B (junk status) in 2026.

Jury report: Banning: A City Alarmingly Mismanaged · PDF page 14

Permanent link

Official responses

Banning Mayor Richard Royce

Agrees, with dated rating history and fiscal context.

Read official response · PDF page 25

Pages 25–26 cite S&P downgrade dates, late audited statements and financial pressures. These are specific traceable explanations, not an independent audit or verified forecast of recovery.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning Mayor Pro Tem Cindy Barrington

Agrees, with dated rating history and fiscal context.

Read official response · PDF page 25

Pages 25–26 cite S&P downgrade dates, late audited statements and financial pressures. These are specific traceable explanations, not an independent audit or verified forecast of recovery.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning Council Member Colleen Wallace

Agrees, with dated rating history and fiscal context.

Read official response · PDF page 25

Pages 25–26 cite S&P downgrade dates, late audited statements and financial pressures. These are specific traceable explanations, not an independent audit or verified forecast of recovery.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning Council Member Leroy Miller

Agrees, with dated rating history and fiscal context.

Read official response · PDF page 25

Pages 25–26 cite S&P downgrade dates, late audited statements and financial pressures. These are specific traceable explanations, not an independent audit or verified forecast of recovery.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning City Manager Elizabeth M. Gibbs

Agrees, with dated rating history and fiscal context.

Read official response · PDF page 25

Pages 25–26 cite S&P downgrade dates, late audited statements and financial pressures. These are specific traceable explanations, not an independent audit or verified forecast of recovery.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions