Finding F3
The Cost Allocation Plan utilized from 2018 to present contains serious errors and lack internal controls.
Jury report: Banning: A City Alarmingly Mismanaged · PDF page 14
Permanent linkOfficial responses
Banning Mayor Richard Royce
Partly disagrees; distinguishes current allocation work from historical weaknesses.
Read official response · PDF page 25Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Banning Mayor Pro Tem Cindy Barrington
Partly disagrees; distinguishes current allocation work from historical weaknesses.
Read official response · PDF page 25Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Banning Council Member Colleen Wallace
Partly disagrees; distinguishes current allocation work from historical weaknesses.
Read official response · PDF page 25Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Banning Council Member Leroy Miller
Partly disagrees; distinguishes current allocation work from historical weaknesses.
Read official response · PDF page 25Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.
Banning City Manager Elizabeth M. Gibbs
Partly disagrees; distinguishes current allocation work from historical weaknesses.
Read official response · PDF page 25Pages 24–25 discuss allocation plans and controls over time. Clear temporal disagreement is not treated as independent verification of all historical costs.
This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.