Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F1

Finding F1

The Banning Electric Utility (BEU) went from a $31 million surplus in 2018, to a $9 million deficit in 2022.

Jury report: Banning: A City Alarmingly Mismanaged · PDF page 14

Permanent link

Official responses

Banning Mayor Richard Royce

Partly disagrees; distinguishes fund balance, cash, adjustments and reconciliations.

Read official response · PDF page 22

Pages 22–23 discuss the reported years and types of financial measures. These distinctions identify the disputed comparison but are not an independent financial audit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning Mayor Pro Tem Cindy Barrington

Partly disagrees; distinguishes fund balance, cash, adjustments and reconciliations.

Read official response · PDF page 22

Pages 22–23 discuss the reported years and types of financial measures. These distinctions identify the disputed comparison but are not an independent financial audit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning Council Member Colleen Wallace

Partly disagrees; distinguishes fund balance, cash, adjustments and reconciliations.

Read official response · PDF page 22

Pages 22–23 discuss the reported years and types of financial measures. These distinctions identify the disputed comparison but are not an independent financial audit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning Council Member Leroy Miller

Partly disagrees; distinguishes fund balance, cash, adjustments and reconciliations.

Read official response · PDF page 22

Pages 22–23 discuss the reported years and types of financial measures. These distinctions identify the disputed comparison but are not an independent financial audit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Banning City Manager Elizabeth M. Gibbs

Partly disagrees; distinguishes fund balance, cash, adjustments and reconciliations.

Read official response · PDF page 22

Pages 22–23 discuss the reported years and types of financial measures. These distinctions identify the disputed comparison but are not an independent financial audit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions