Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R-2

Recommendation R-2

Mono County should increase the staff of the elections office by a minimum of one full-time person to work on election management. This would enable outreach and voter education work proposed in Recommendation 1 to be carried out, ideally allowing one day per month for this work. The additional staff time would also ensure that the increasingly complex and evolving election laws and regulations are implemented in a timely manner; the more frequent and special elections can be efficiently managed; voter rolls are accurately maintained; written materials are produced that are accessible and accurate; and that all election procedures including the recruitment, training, and supervision of temporary staff is carried out. Action: Board of Supervisors. Chief Administrative Officer. Registrar of Voters. Timeframe: 3 months The Mono County Civil Grand Jury is pleased to note that the Board of Supervisors, on 04.21.2026, approved an increase in staffing for the Office of the Registrar of Voters.

Jury report: Mono County Election Procedures: Challenges and Opportunities · PDF page 13

Permanent link

Official responses

Mono County Administrative Officer

Agency says implemented

Agrees and marks implementation complete, citing the Elections Program Coordinator role and its voter education responsibilities.

Read official response · PDF page 5

Reports completion of the staffing addition. The response’s last explanatory sentence is truncated; the completion statement remains explicit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Mono County Registrar of Voters

Agency says implemented

Agrees and marks implementation complete, citing the Elections Program Coordinator role and its voter education responsibilities.

Read official response · PDF page 9

Reports completion of the staffing addition. The response’s last explanatory sentence is truncated; the completion statement remains explicit.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions