Response says
Agrees that staffing is insufficient, reports a Chief Information Security Officer hired in March 2025, and plans work with Human Resources on a Cyber Security Analyst position.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F6-BOS
Cybersecurity staffing
What should residents consider about Finding F6-BOS: Cybersecurity staffing, and the County’s response?
Mono County Information Technology Director; Mono County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response’s engagement is evaluated independently of whether the County’s security measures are effective.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Explicit agreement addresses the staffing constraint and delayed work. The March 2025 hire is a dated, checkable event, and the response identifies the analyst recruitment steps.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...