Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4-IT

Unsupported computing equipment

What should residents consider about Finding F4-IT: Unsupported computing equipment, and the County’s response?

Mono County Information Technology Director; Mono County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees that end-of-life devices remain and describes funding and staffing limits within the Technology Refresh/Internal Service Fund established in 2014.

Audit analysis

The response’s engagement is evaluated independently of whether the County’s security measures are effective.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Explicit agreement covers the risk and obsolete equipment. The explanation names the 2014 internal service fund, how departments fund it, and specific replacement constraints.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is