Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Report overview
Response synthesis and audit

Board response to solid waste operations

The Board acknowledges incomplete CORE implementation, promises a phased plan within 12–18 months of publication, and partly disputes the contracting finding. Existing agreements and future evaluation are described without establishing that all are multi-year.

Response by Mariposa County Board of Supervisors

2

Addressed

2

Partially addressed

0

Not addressed

0

Unclear

County's stated disposition

These categories reflect the County's response to each recommendation, separate from this audit's assessment.

0

Implemented

1

Will be implemented

0

Requires further analysis

0

Will not be implemented

1

Unclear

How to read this audit

This review assesses the response document, not independently verified implementation, factual accuracy, or legal compliance. Each audit identifies its respondent and letter date. Page citations refer to the assembled response packet. The attached resolution records unanimous adoption on August 18, 2026; the response attachment is not a court-stamped executed copy.

Commitments

Actions stated in the response

These are commitments extracted from the County's response. They describe what the response says will happen; they do not verify that implementation occurred.

2

Extracted commitments

1

Definite or bounded timing

0

Conditional timing

1

No timeframe

Item-by-item review

Findings and recommendations

Assessments describe whether the response engages each cited item. Finding scores separately describe statutory-elements completeness under California Penal Code § 933.05(a) and public usefulness. They do not independently verify the response or constitute a legal conclusion.

Showing 4 of 4 items

finding · F4 — Board

Incomplete CORE implementation

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Agrees; the continuation on packet page 9 attributes delays to vacancies and management turnover and says some recommendations were completed, modified, or deferred.

Audit analysis

The acceptance is explicit on this page. The explanation continues on the following page, with concrete staffing and operational reasons but no implementation ledger.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The acceptance is explicit on this page. The explanation continues on the following page, with concrete staffing and operational reasons but no implementation ledger.

Scoring confidence: high

recommendation · R4 — Board

Remaining CORE phases

County: Will be implementedAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Will prepare a phased plan for remaining applicable recommendations with dates and responsibilities, for Board presentation within 12–18 months of report publication.

Audit analysis

The response commits to a plan rather than completion of all phases. It narrows the scope to applicable recommendations and leaves the final project schedule to that plan.

Extracted commitments

Present a phased plan for remaining applicable CORE recommendations with responsibilities and target dates.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
Within 12–18 months of publication of the 2025–2026 final report. · Bounded timeframe

finding · F5 — Board

Long-term disposal contracts and ratepayer effects

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Partly disagrees, citing agreements with Recology and Yosemite and acknowledging no formal long-term Merced agreement.

Audit analysis

The disagreement explains which counterparties have agreements, but not their duration or the finding’s claimed fiscal and ratepayer effects. Coverage is incomplete and no contract record is identified.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

4/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The disagreement explains which counterparties have agreements, but not their duration or the finding’s claimed fiscal and ratepayer effects. Coverage is incomplete and no contract record is identified.

Scoring confidence: high

recommendation · R5 — Board

Multi-year waste agreements

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Calls the recommendation implemented in part and says it will evaluate opportunities to negotiate long-term agreements.

Audit analysis

Partial implementation is not full completion. The letter does not establish multi-year terms for all three counterparties or commit to securing the missing agreement.

Extracted commitments

Continue evaluating opportunities to negotiate long-term waste agreements.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
No timeframe stated