Sheriff and Board responses to detention conditions

Response says

Mariposa County Sheriff's Office: Accepts the finding and says Public Works sealed roof edges while a permanent solution is developed.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement covers the finding. Roof-edge sealing and collaboration with Public Works are concrete assertions, but no work order or completion record is identified.

Response says

Mariposa County Sheriff's Office: Reports temporary sealing and continued monitoring and evaluation of maintenance and capital needs.

Audit analysis

Interim repairs engage the problem, but the letter does not commit to a permanent roof project or give a completion timetable.

Response says

Mariposa County Sheriff's Office: Accepts the finding and reports a budget request to replace the electronic door system.

Audit analysis

The explicit agreement covers the absence of a fail-safe. The upcoming-fiscal-year budget request gives a checkable planning reference, but approval is not established.

Response says

Mariposa County Sheriff's Office: Says replacement depends on approval of a budget request for the upcoming fiscal year.

Audit analysis

Replacement is conditional and the response does not specify that the design includes the recommended manual backup or fail-safe.

Response says

Mariposa County Sheriff's Office: Accepts the finding; one vacancy has been filled and a second candidate is undergoing a background investigation.

Audit analysis

Agreement covers staffing and retention. The response provides specific recruitment status and ongoing retention efforts, without identifying personnel or staffing records.

Response says

Mariposa County Sheriff's Office: Describes hiring progress and continued recruitment, retention, and succession planning.

Audit analysis

The response engages staffing but does not describe the recommended incentive program, its funding, or a timeline.

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Defers detention findings and recommendations to the Sheriff’s July 8 letter, while acknowledging its own funding and budget role.

Audit analysis

The Board identifies the Sheriff’s response but gives no independent position on this item or a decision within its acknowledged budget role. Referral is not an agreement, disagreement, or implementation disposition.

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Defers detention findings and recommendations to the Sheriff’s July 8 letter, while acknowledging its own funding and budget role.

Audit analysis

The Board identifies the Sheriff’s response but gives no independent position on this item or a decision within its acknowledged budget role. Referral is not an agreement, disagreement, or implementation disposition.

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Defers detention findings and recommendations to the Sheriff’s July 8 letter, while acknowledging its own funding and budget role.

Audit analysis

The Board identifies the Sheriff’s response but gives no independent position on this item or a decision within its acknowledged budget role. Referral is not an agreement, disagreement, or implementation disposition.

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Defers detention findings and recommendations to the Sheriff’s July 8 letter, while acknowledging its own funding and budget role.

Audit analysis

The Board identifies the Sheriff’s response but gives no independent position on this item or a decision within its acknowledged budget role. Referral is not an agreement, disagreement, or implementation disposition.

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Defers detention findings and recommendations to the Sheriff’s July 8 letter, while acknowledging its own funding and budget role.

Audit analysis

The Board identifies the Sheriff’s response but gives no independent position on this item or a decision within its acknowledged budget role. Referral is not an agreement, disagreement, or implementation disposition.

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Defers detention findings and recommendations to the Sheriff’s July 8 letter, while acknowledging its own funding and budget role.

Audit analysis

The Board identifies the Sheriff’s response but gives no independent position on this item or a decision within its acknowledged budget role. Referral is not an agreement, disagreement, or implementation disposition.