Response says
Partly agrees with the historical concern; claims non-public-hours appointments are now advertised.
What should residents consider about Finding F5: The County Planning and Building Department’s homepage does not state that appointment times are available during non-public hours. This reduces public access to services, extends processing times, and delays or impedes completion of projects. (R6), and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partly agrees with the historical concern; claims non-public-hours appointments are now advertised.
Audit analysis
Pages 3–4 distinguish possible past omission from current homepage information. The response clarifies the temporal disagreement but does not independently establish service outcomes.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
4/6
Public usefulness
Pages 3–4 distinguish possible past omission from current homepage information. The response clarifies the temporal disagreement but does not independently establish service outcomes.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.