Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, citing a separate “Resources” tab and the established process for adding content.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F6
Additional public resources
What should residents consider about Finding F6: Additional public resources, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The separate section directly contradicts the alleged absence, and the named tab is traceable. Resource contents are not detailed, limiting explanatory specificity rather than the position elements.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The separate section directly contradicts the alleged absence, and the named tab is traceable. Resource contents are not detailed, limiting explanatory specificity rather than the position elements.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...