Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, naming contact and complaint tabs with phone, mailing, email, and submission information.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5
Contact and complaint guidance
What should residents consider about Finding F5: Contact and complaint guidance, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Named sections and contact modes supply specific reasons and a checkable basis. The response identifies existing guidance, while inviting requests about alternative placement rather than independently establishing prominence.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Named sections and contact modes supply specific reasons and a checkable basis. The response identifies existing guidance, while inviting requests about alternative placement rather than independently establishing prominence.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...