Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, citing “What to Expect in a Civil Grand Jury Interview” and its structure, duration, confidentiality, and follow-up guidance.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Interview information
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Interview information, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
A whole-disagreement position and a named website section directly address the finding. The described content and service agreement are checkable bases, not an independent archived-site comparison.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
A whole-disagreement position and a named website section directly address the finding. The described content and service agreement are checkable bases, not an independent archived-site comparison.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...